Lawyers can argue either side of anything. That's their job, after all.
Let's see the evidence and hear the arguments before we decide that Donnie is as pure as the driven snow.
tl;dr - Just because something seems "obvious" to us based on our understanding of the text of the law, the clear meaning of words, and the evidence that we've heard about in the press, doesn't mean that he'll be found guilty. Look at Bob McDonnell.
Bob McDonnell convicted on 11 counts of corruption
Conviction vacated by SCOTUS over weaseling on the meaning of 'official act'
McDonnell was as guilty as sin. He sold his office. SCOTUS decided (even though it was 8:0) that he wasn't because, I guess, IOKIYAR.
FWIW.
Cheers,
Scott.
Let's see the evidence and hear the arguments before we decide that Donnie is as pure as the driven snow.
tl;dr - Just because something seems "obvious" to us based on our understanding of the text of the law, the clear meaning of words, and the evidence that we've heard about in the press, doesn't mean that he'll be found guilty. Look at Bob McDonnell.
Bob McDonnell convicted on 11 counts of corruption
Conviction vacated by SCOTUS over weaseling on the meaning of 'official act'
McDonnell was as guilty as sin. He sold his office. SCOTUS decided (even though it was 8:0) that he wasn't because, I guess, IOKIYAR.
FWIW.
Cheers,
Scott.