https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW0q8i3u6E
They used a shitty camera, tweaked the brightness before releasing, or both.
They used a shitty camera, tweaked the brightness before releasing, or both.
New video ... they're evil, and screwed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRW0q8i3u6E They used a shitty camera, tweaked the brightness before releasing, or both. -- Drew |
|
Not shocked at all...
|
|
Me neither. Lower quality camera === more profits for shareholders. Capitalism is evil.
bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again. |
|
Confused. What does that video show?
Here's the actual accident: https://www.cnn.com/videos/cnnmoney/2018/03/19/uber-self-driving-autonomous-crash-arizona-pedestrian-dead-cnnmoney-orig.cnnmoney I would have been able to avoid that EASILY at 48 mph which was the reported speed (at least in 1 article I read.) Hell, I've avoided deer in fog going about 65 at 1/2 the visibility. And they have lider, ie: can see in the dark. This one is at LEAST manslaughter. |
|
Uber's makes it look unavoidable
The second video shows you have a clear field of view at the accident spot with plenty of range to spot a pedestrian approaching from the left. Reporting about the speed limit has been confusing. Tempe PD originally said the car was doing 38 in a 35 mph zone. Streetview shows a 35 sign just before the river, but then a 45 sign just before the overpass. Maybe Uber's AI is even more human: don't slow me down when I'm accelerating, fool! (Although upping the speed limit just before you get to a complicated intersection should probably be added to the collection of roadway design gaffes.) |