doubling the personal excemtion would be very useful. So would extending the SS tax to any income without an upper limit but I suppose 1/2 is better than none.
Union of Concerned Scientists re the latest tax-rapine, as it affects--you know--"a Critique of
- (Ashton)
- (14)
- Nov. 20, 2017, 03:34:27 PM EST
cmon, you know if they passed a tax bill that took everything above $250k a year
- (boxley)
- (13)
- Nov. 21, 2017, 08:29:20 PM EST
Is there really no way you can stop yourself from spouting such egregious bullshit? Just wondering.
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- (12)
- Nov. 22, 2017, 01:12:22 AM EST
no more than scientists who are not economists can gather as a group and spout crap
-NT
- (boxley)
- (11)
- Nov. 22, 2017, 05:13:29 PM EST
First you'd best face the dilemma of just what "Econ" IS, bunkie
- (Ashton)
- (10)
- Nov. 22, 2017, 06:37:56 PM EST
Econ is a lot of things mostly wrong
- (boxley)
- (9)
- Nov. 23, 2017, 12:36:27 PM EST
Yeah, we'll trust your folksy alt-right homilies over all the economic scientists in the world.
- (CRConrad)
- (2)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 05:19:27 AM EST
you can toe a line but ole mike had to tow it
-NT
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 11:34:03 AM EST
OTT
- (hnick)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 12:25:21 PM EST
Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is right
- (drook)
- (5)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 09:31:26 AM EST
Re: Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is not right
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 11:37:23 AM EST
I was replying to you, not Ashton
- (drook)
- (3)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 01:12:46 PM EST
that is two distict and separate assertions
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 01:36:19 PM EST
Now you've Boxed-self-in to explaining the word "useful"
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 03:19:52 PM EST
retooling the tax code is useful
- (boxley)
- Nov. 24, 2017, 03:26:18 PM EST