IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Now you've Boxed-self-in to explaining the word "useful"
Hmmm Göbbels was (a) useful tool for --> the Ends of the perhaps Prime-sociopath of the last century..
you sure that was a good word upon which to hang some irascible/incoherent musing?

Since via-simple-inspection LOTS of things "Repos deem 'useful'" involve deception, infinite forms of dissembling and in-the-end: are SAID: only so as to increase personal-net-worth while utterly ignoring/aka disdaining the harm they cause [ergo Intentionally, as-in-premeditated Lying] to the masses who comprise the actual and entire dis-US: such as, Today It IS.

cf. ..and that man simply Used me! when he _____ etc. etc. Yup, great word-associations there.
Go ahead, Man-splain away ... maybe in Esperanto?
or as we say en Español: ¡Que lastima!



You are entitled to Any Old opinions, flat-out.
You aren't entitled to employ your-own-'facts' or alt-definitions of common words, I wot.
New retooling the tax code is useful
doubling the personal excemtion would be very useful. So would extending the SS tax to any income without an upper limit but I suppose 1/2 is better than none.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
     Union of Concerned Scientists re the latest tax-rapine, as it affects--you know--"a Critique of - (Ashton) - (14)
         cmon, you know if they passed a tax bill that took everything above $250k a year - (boxley) - (13)
             Is there really no way you can stop yourself from spouting such egregious bullshit? Just wondering. -NT - (CRConrad) - (12)
                 no more than scientists who are not economists can gather as a group and spout crap -NT - (boxley) - (11)
                     First you'd best face the dilemma of just what "Econ" IS, bunkie - (Ashton) - (10)
                         Econ is a lot of things mostly wrong - (boxley) - (9)
                             Yeah, we'll trust your folksy alt-right homilies over all the economic scientists in the world. - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                 you can toe a line but ole mike had to tow it -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                     OTT - (hnick)
                             Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is right - (drook) - (5)
                                 Re: Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is not right - (boxley) - (4)
                                     I was replying to you, not Ashton - (drook) - (3)
                                         that is two distict and separate assertions - (boxley) - (2)
                                             Now you've Boxed-self-in to explaining the word "useful" - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 retooling the tax code is useful - (boxley)

Loopholes and fine print are there for a reason, and it's not to make you happy.
70 ms