IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New that is two distict and separate assertions
1. Econ is a lot of things mostly wrong

2.the branch of science THAT particular group of scientists belong to is the study that everything a repo deems useful must ergo be wrong in fact, and postulate theories as to why.

bolded uppercase that refers to the Union of Concerned Scientists
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Expand Edited by boxley Nov. 24, 2017, 01:36:19 PM EST
New Now you've Boxed-self-in to explaining the word "useful"
Hmmm Göbbels was (a) useful tool for --> the Ends of the perhaps Prime-sociopath of the last century..
you sure that was a good word upon which to hang some irascible/incoherent musing?

Since via-simple-inspection LOTS of things "Repos deem 'useful'" involve deception, infinite forms of dissembling and in-the-end: are SAID: only so as to increase personal-net-worth while utterly ignoring/aka disdaining the harm they cause [ergo Intentionally, as-in-premeditated Lying] to the masses who comprise the actual and entire dis-US: such as, Today It IS.

cf. ..and that man simply Used me! when he _____ etc. etc. Yup, great word-associations there.
Go ahead, Man-splain away ... maybe in Esperanto?
or as we say en Español: ¡Que lastima!



You are entitled to Any Old opinions, flat-out.
You aren't entitled to employ your-own-'facts' or alt-definitions of common words, I wot.
New retooling the tax code is useful
doubling the personal excemtion would be very useful. So would extending the SS tax to any income without an upper limit but I suppose 1/2 is better than none.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
     Union of Concerned Scientists re the latest tax-rapine, as it affects--you know--"a Critique of - (Ashton) - (14)
         cmon, you know if they passed a tax bill that took everything above $250k a year - (boxley) - (13)
             Is there really no way you can stop yourself from spouting such egregious bullshit? Just wondering. -NT - (CRConrad) - (12)
                 no more than scientists who are not economists can gather as a group and spout crap -NT - (boxley) - (11)
                     First you'd best face the dilemma of just what "Econ" IS, bunkie - (Ashton) - (10)
                         Econ is a lot of things mostly wrong - (boxley) - (9)
                             Yeah, we'll trust your folksy alt-right homilies over all the economic scientists in the world. - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                 you can toe a line but ole mike had to tow it -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                     OTT - (hnick)
                             Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is right - (drook) - (5)
                                 Re: Suppose, for the sake of argument, your premise is not right - (boxley) - (4)
                                     I was replying to you, not Ashton - (drook) - (3)
                                         that is two distict and separate assertions - (boxley) - (2)
                                             Now you've Boxed-self-in to explaining the word "useful" - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                 retooling the tax code is useful - (boxley)

Fighting with the Gamelons, we won't stop until we've won!
84 ms