Emphasis Mine for the Comprehension Impaired. That'd be you, Christian
http://forum.iwethey.org/forum/post/419670/
"Did I reply to that one without reading even the slightest part of it, or what?" What. Since the line I referenced in my response was the last fucking line of the post (you know, the one you said didn't exist; who is that didn't read before replying?) I would have thought it clear that I'd read the entire fucking thing before responding. If this the way Europeans think, no fucking wonder Britain voted to leave.
The rest of Drew's "points" are not worth answering, but since you insist ...
Point: "Yes, this is wrong, but they're not opposing it the right way."
A: WTF is this supposed to mean? I suggest that the removal of the monuments could be done in a more orderly fashion with a substantially less likelihood of violence LIKE, SAY, THE WAY BALTIMORE DID THE VERY NEXT FUCKING DAY and this is somehow a White Supremacist argument? Are you and he really that thick?
Point: "This isn't a perfect solution, so they shouldn't do it."
A: Where the FUCK did I say they shouldn't do it? Go ahead. Try to find it. I'll wait.
Point: "Instead of this thing they're doing, it would be better to do this other thing that is far more expensive, logistically impossible, and likely to meet even more opposition."
A: This is such a stupid, ill-informed statement that I hardly think it needs to be answered, but, again, you insist. "Logistically impossible" eh? Pretty clearly not impossible. Since Baltimore did what I suggested, by Drew's "logic" that makes the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore "White Sumpremacists", right?
Any more baseless claims you want to make?
"Yes, this is wrong, but they're not opposing it the right way."
"This isn't a perfect solution, so they shouldn't do it."
"Instead of this thing they're doing, it would be better to do this other thing that is far more expensive, logistically impossible, and likely to meet even more opposition."
Any other verses from the "Don't Fuck With My Privilege" songbook
http://forum.iwethey.org/forum/post/419670/
"Did I reply to that one without reading even the slightest part of it, or what?" What. Since the line I referenced in my response was the last fucking line of the post (you know, the one you said didn't exist; who is that didn't read before replying?) I would have thought it clear that I'd read the entire fucking thing before responding. If this the way Europeans think, no fucking wonder Britain voted to leave.
The rest of Drew's "points" are not worth answering, but since you insist ...
Point: "Yes, this is wrong, but they're not opposing it the right way."
A: WTF is this supposed to mean? I suggest that the removal of the monuments could be done in a more orderly fashion with a substantially less likelihood of violence LIKE, SAY, THE WAY BALTIMORE DID THE VERY NEXT FUCKING DAY and this is somehow a White Supremacist argument? Are you and he really that thick?
Point: "This isn't a perfect solution, so they shouldn't do it."
A: Where the FUCK did I say they shouldn't do it? Go ahead. Try to find it. I'll wait.
Point: "Instead of this thing they're doing, it would be better to do this other thing that is far more expensive, logistically impossible, and likely to meet even more opposition."
A: This is such a stupid, ill-informed statement that I hardly think it needs to be answered, but, again, you insist. "Logistically impossible" eh? Pretty clearly not impossible. Since Baltimore did what I suggested, by Drew's "logic" that makes the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore "White Sumpremacists", right?
Any more baseless claims you want to make?