See if you can make the strongest possible argument that the Clinton's did nothing wrong. Include describing how their opponents present completely opposite facts - eg: they paid for it, they didn't pay for it - as both proving their guilt. Then see if you can refute that.
I know you won't, but the point of the exercise would be that you either don't understand the other side, or don't have an answer to it.
I know you won't, but the point of the exercise would be that you either don't understand the other side, or don't have an answer to it.