Or is a professor emeritus of M.I.T. also a Putin tool?
Edit:
Alex, I understand you have a justifiable, deep, abiding mistrust of Russians. In this instance, I'm a little concerned that this completely understandable distrust of Russians is blinding you to the fact that no real proof has been offered to justify an illegal bombing of Syria by us.
Yet the administration’s report has come under withering scrutiny from Dr. Theodore Postol, a professor emeritus of science, technology, and national-security policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who once served as a scientific adviser to the chief of naval operations at the Pentagon.
Postol’s exhaustive critique of the White House report notes that “The only undisputable facts stated in the White House report is the claim that a chemical attack using nerve agent occurred in Khan Shaykhun, Syria.” And yet, according to Postol, “the report contains absolutely no evidence that this attack was the result of a munition being dropped from an aircraft. In fact, the report contains absolutely no evidence that would indicate who was the perpetrator of this atrocity.”
Postol writes that “The only source the document cites as evidence that the attack was by the Syrian government is the crater it claims to have identified on a road in the North of Khan Shaykhun.” Yet his analysis of the photographs of the crater provided by the White House “clearly indicates that the munition was almost certainly placed on the ground with an external detonating explosive on top of it that crushed the container so as to disperse the alleged load of sarin.”
Edit:
Alex, I understand you have a justifiable, deep, abiding mistrust of Russians. In this instance, I'm a little concerned that this completely understandable distrust of Russians is blinding you to the fact that no real proof has been offered to justify an illegal bombing of Syria by us.