IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Congress killed the SSC.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-supercollider-that-never-was/

A good article.

Originally estimated to cost $4.4 billion, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to kill the project in the summer of 1992, when costs had risen to $8.25 billion, but it was saved by the Senate, although a $100-million cut below requested funds put the project further behind schedule, increasing its costs even more. By the fall of 1993 the estimated cost had risen to a minimum of $11 billion (equivalent to $18 billion today), in part because administrative overhead proved larger than anticipated, and refined calculations of expected beam losses lead to a magnet redesign. (There were to be about 10,000 of them in the ring.) The latter’s increased cost, about $2 billion, could have been avoided by accepting a smaller ring and its resulting lower energy, but that idea was rejected by upper scientific and academic management.

But not all of the project’s costs were included in the initial estimates, according to a DoE report completed four years after the ax came down. About $500 million for detectors, $400 million for operations needed before the lab was finished, $60 million for land purchases and $118 million for DoE project management were excluded from cost estimates. Crucial to projects of such a size, a project cost and scheduling system was never fully implemented, concealing substantial cost overruns, according to the report.


There were lots of reasons why it died. Putting it in Hootchitfatchit, Texas rather than at Fermilab in Illinois was one of the first and expensive bad choices (but this article doesn't mention that).

There weren't any "savings" in killing the SSC - it was already far over budget when it was killed.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Who signed it into law? Congress? </me falls over>
WASHINGTON, Oct. 30— Lamenting its death as "a serious loss" to science, President Clinton on Friday signed a bill killing the $11 billion superconducting supercollider project.

Mr. Clinton was forced to accept the termination of the Texas project when a budget-conscious Congress voted to abandon the program, which is one-fifth complete with a 14-mile-long underground tunnel and complex of laboratory buildings.

About $640 million for the project had been in an energy and water spending bill. That money will now be spent to dismantle the project.

"This project was an important element of our nation's science program," Mr. Clinton said in a written statement, "and its termination is a serious loss for the field of high energy physics."

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/us/stating-regret-clinton-signs-bill-that-kills-supercollider.html

So, the "budget-conscious Congress" wasn't concerned with "saving money"? Let me guess, it's still Congress' fault that WJC signed the bill killing it and that's okay because, after all, WJC "felt our pain" when he did it.

Seriously, can we never expect to see a single criticism of the Clintons from you, ever?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New "forced". HTH.
New Forced on repeal Glass-Stegall, end welfare as we know it, NAFTA, Ruben @ Treasury, etc. right?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New It's very hard to have a conversation with you when you keep bringing up extraneous things...
     ..a March for Science, 4-22-17 in D.C. (You'unses Eastward: Be There --> y'Hear!?) - (Ashton) - (10)
         I'll be there. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             My daughter and I will be, too. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Science disconnect - (dmcarls) - (7)
             I'd like to see a breakdown by field of AAAS response to the Space Station. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                 Congress killed the SSC. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                     Who signed it into law? Congress? </me falls over> - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                         "forced". HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             Forced on repeal Glass-Stegall, end welfare as we know it, NAFTA, Ruben @ Treasury, etc. right? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                 It's very hard to have a conversation with you when you keep bringing up extraneous things... -NT - (Another Scott)
             Mostly unsurprising, given the level of sci. knowledge in the main tribes. -NT - (Ashton)

An instinct for the regrettable that is almost uncanny.
69 ms