IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New There's the American Privilege that makes us the envy of the world.
Like most Americans, if it doesn't happen in front of them, it doesn't happen. Or at least it doesn't matter. I take it your argument is "We only kill some of them. That's better than barring all of them from entry"? You do realize that is an idiotic thing to say or, $DEITY help you, believe, right? 100,000+ civilian deaths in Iraq is acceptable because, "it's only some people" and I'm the RW'er?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
Expand Edited by mmoffitt Feb. 9, 2017, 08:05:30 AM EST
New Still accepting their frame
Are there Syrian soldiers attacking civilians? I'd prefer that's none of our business, but no, I'm not too broken up about killing them.

So it's not about killing "some" vs "all" of them. It's about which ones. Exactly the distinction the ban doesn't make. Refugees are not terrorists.
--

Drew
New "Refugees are not terrorists" Somali much?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New They did it too! Wah wah wah, neener neener.
--

Drew
New sorry, didnt realise there was a special on poor generalizations this week
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New I forgot.
Our "smart bombs" never hit innocent civilians, including wedding parties and children. They only hit "the bad guys." Right?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New The real world is complicated.
Pretending that the only way to make it better is to wait for the perfect candidate that is worthy of your vote, and in the meantime tut-tut about how stupid everyone is and how we somehow "deserve" to be destroyed by a bunch of know-nothing racist fascists, is beneath you.

Bernie's made a big deal about how he wants to "work with" Trump, you know. But Bernie was so much better because reasons...

TBogg again.

(sigh)

Cheers,
Scott.
New It is complicated. But that doesn't mean it should come down to the lesser of two evils.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New It *always* comes down to a choice between imperfect candidates. You know this.
New You can accept that's the current reality of our political system ...
Or you can abstain from voting.

Oh look! Another choice between two bad alternatives! I wonder which one he'll choose ...
--

Drew
New All politicians are gits.
All of them.

It's always a choice of the less-cunty of two cunts.

And Clinton, for all her faults, is waaaaaaaaaaay less cunty than Cheeto Jesus.
New No argument. But, does that mean it's "less cunty" to bomb people than it is to ban them?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Which people?
--

Drew
New Seriously?
Looking back at President Obama’s legacy, the Council on Foreign Relation’s Micah Zenko added up the defense department’s data on airstrikes and made a startling revelation: in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. This means that every day last year, the US military blasted combatants or civilians overseas with 72 bombs; that’s three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.

While most of these air attacks were in Syria and Iraq, US bombs also rained down on people in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. That’s seven majority-Muslim countries.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Argument #13862.
I'm sure Bernie would have banned dropping bombs on people.

That would have kept McConnell from silencing Warren for sure!!1

;-p

Cheers,
Scott.
New WTF has Bernie got to do with it?
The question I put forth is, "How could people who are (rightly) outraged at the travel ban have remained silent when those very same people's countries were being bombed with alacrity?" Along those same lines, where, pray tell, does one imagine all those refugees came from and why? Iraq War? Libyan bombings? "Assad must go"?

But since you brought Bernie up, who was it, again, who voted for the Iraq invasion and who voted against?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Argument #13863.
Trump is the enemy. Redebating the Iraq war, or the PPACA, or the $1T coin, or ..., isn't going to solve anything.

Eyes on the prize.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: Seriously?
Bernie would have authorised drone strikes, just like Obama did, and just like Trump is going to.

Now, you can indulge in some prime angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin horseshit about how Bernie wouldn't have authorised as many drone strikes, but fact is: innocents were always going to die, whether the person signing off is an old fat white man with a wig, an old fat white man without a wig, or an old not-so-fat woman with frankly great hair.

It sucks, if you're on the receiving end of that high-quality made-in-America ordnance. But that's just where US foreign policy is, these days.
     Warren is silenced. - (mmoffitt) - (25)
         Interesting point - (drook)
         voting matters? - (rcareaga) - (21)
             Intentionally missing the point? - (mmoffitt) - (20)
                 False dichotomy - (drook) - (19)
                     Perfect lrpd - (crazy)
                     There's the American Privilege that makes us the envy of the world. - (mmoffitt) - (17)
                         Still accepting their frame - (drook) - (16)
                             "Refugees are not terrorists" Somali much? -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                 They did it too! Wah wah wah, neener neener. -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                     sorry, didnt realise there was a special on poor generalizations this week -NT - (boxley)
                             I forgot. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
                                 The real world is complicated. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                     It is complicated. But that doesn't mean it should come down to the lesser of two evils. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (10)
                                         It *always* comes down to a choice between imperfect candidates. You know this. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                         You can accept that's the current reality of our political system ... - (drook)
                                         All politicians are gits. - (pwhysall) - (7)
                                             No argument. But, does that mean it's "less cunty" to bomb people than it is to ban them? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                                 Which people? -NT - (drook) - (5)
                                                     Seriously? - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                         Argument #13862. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                             WTF has Bernie got to do with it? - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                 Argument #13863. - (Another Scott)
                                                         Re: Seriously? - (pwhysall)
         Technically, Warren just read someone else's words. - (a6l6e6x)
         Queue Streisand Effect in 3 ... 2 ... 1 - (scoenye)

What a 'tard.
75 ms