Ah, I see.

Post #41,663 by Brandioch 6/8/02 5:21:55 PM Reply	Ah, I see. Have I >once< said I supported the plan? Well, well, well...... I will admit I am WRONG... if You will clearly state that you oppose the plan. Nope...now we have you lieing about my position again. Again? I don't think so. But, as I've stated, I will admit I was wrong about your position. All you have to do is say that you oppose the plan. Otherwise, I was not wrong. Even though you did not state it, that is your position. Again, another simple test.
Post #41,669 by bepatient 6/8/02 6:34:38 PM Reply	No. The admission should already be made. I have...not once...stated that I support the plan. You invented that position to continue an argument about what >you think< I believe. True or False? You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #41,703 by Brandioch 6/9/02 2:21:31 AM Reply	Logic is beyond you, isn't it? I say you support the plan. You say that I'm lieing. Therefore, you do not support the plan. But you do support the plan. Therefore, I was not lieing. Therefore, it is you who was lieing when you said I was lieing about your support of the plan. There are things refered to as "logic" and "deduction" and "reasoning". Just because you did not say you supported something does not mean that you do not support it. Nor am I limited to what you explicitly state. There are also the phrases you use and the what is implied in your statements. As I said, I will admit that I was wrong WHEN you state that you oppose the plan. Otherwise, I will stand by my statement that you support it even though you have not said so explicitly. You invented that position to continue an argument about what >you think< I believe. There was no invention necessary. But it is what I think you believe. Again, I have said that I will admit I was wrong WHEN you state your position AND such a statement is CONTRARY to what I have stated. Notice, I have no problems stating, in no uncertain terms, what I believe. Why is it that you do?
Post #41,725 by a6l6e6x 6/9/02 12:44:08 PM Reply	OT: Amusing how you two are cooperating... in establishing a new variation of how to spell "lying". I did say OT! :) Alex "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." -- Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Post #41,731 by bepatient 6/9/02 2:14:01 PM Reply	Yeah.... I noticed that after I threw it up....one of those gnawing things about it "just not looking right"... Always had problems with that. Thanks for the spell-check ;-) You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #41,733 by Brandioch 6/9/02 2:22:40 PM Reply	Spelling should be logical. :) Start with the root word. Lie. Lie'ing Lie'ed Lie's Drive. Drive'ing Drive'ed (not drove) Drive's And so forth. :) That way, learn'ing to congugate verbs take's all of one day. And spell'ing bee's become easy'er, also. Of course, it might deplete the world-wide supply of apostrophe's. But I have a plan to convert un'use'ed comma's.
Post #41,741 by a6l6e6x 6/9/02 3:52:53 PM Reply	I'm with you on that point. English could have more logic. Alex "Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened." -- Winston Churchill (1874-1965)

Welcome to IWETHEY!