IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New that is an assumption not a fact
The rest are retired, sick, disabled, running their households or going to school.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Evidence, please?
New its your claim to prove, not mine
You lifted a quote from the article. I know for a fact of 3 people not listed as looking for work but want to work.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New If they're looking for work, they're part of the "labor force". HTH.
There aren't 90+M "unemployed", unless you twist the definition of what "unemployed" means.

Cheers,
Scott.
New nope, a definition of what the government calls unemployed is
those collected unemployment benefits, or other work assistant subsidies. Those benefits run out and they are no longer counted. Also noted in the article you quoted is was that trump is wrong about california drought, according to officials
http://www.sfgate.com/news/science/article/Officials-More-than-40-percent-of-California-out-10852763.php?ipid=articlerecirc
It's hard to say we have a drought here right now," said Jay Lund, director of the Center for Watershed Sciences at the University of California at Davis, an area near Sacramento that was awash after its heaviest rain in 20 years.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Expand Edited by boxley Jan. 12, 2017, 11:29:47 AM EST
New We're going around in circles...
There aren't 90+M people looking for work who can't find it.

BLS: Labor Force Characteristics lists Discouraged Workers, Displaced Workers, etc., etc.

BLS: Not in the Labor Force lists:

Persons who are neither employed nor unemployed are not in the labor force. This category includes retired persons, students, those taking care of children or other family members, and others who are neither working nor seeking work.


If you're arguing that the "real" number of unemployed is not 5.4M but some slightly higher number - fine, that argument can be made (and that's why there are lots of different measures of unemployment). But that number is not and cannot be 90+M.

On your last, if 40% are not in drought that doesn't mean the other 60% is back to normal. ;-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New "Out of drought"
California's underground water reserves have been so depleted by extra pumping in the drought that they would take decades, at a minimum, to replenish, experts said.

That's not out of the woods by any reasonable definition.
--

Drew
Expand Edited by drook Jan. 12, 2017, 04:02:26 PM EST
     Record 95,102,000 Americans Not in Labor Force; Number Grew 18% Since Obama Took Office in 2009 - (boxley) - (24)
         Counting children doesn't make much sense, does it? (Haven't clicked the CNS link). - (Another Scott) - (8)
             the count only included those over 16, -NT - (boxley) - (6)
                 Eh? - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     Re: Eh? - (boxley) - (4)
                         So the population didn't grow under Obama? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                             if it grew 18% it was over the southern border - (boxley) - (2)
                                 Ok, I'm being thick today. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     no worries - (boxley)
             It's not about counting children. - (malraux)
         Point? - (drook) - (6)
             Re: Point? unemployment is higher than 4.7% but government goes, fap fap fap better -NT - (boxley) - (5)
                 Numbers needed - (drook)
                 Unemployment != everyone who can't find a job. - (malraux) - (3)
                     damn old farts - (boxley) - (2)
                         Still playing numbers games - (drook) - (1)
                             anecdotal is not data - (boxley)
         Calculated Risk straightens us out. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             that is an assumption not a fact - (boxley) - (6)
                 Evidence, please? -NT - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     its your claim to prove, not mine - (boxley) - (4)
                         If they're looking for work, they're part of the "labor force". HTH. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                             nope, a definition of what the government calls unemployed is - (boxley) - (2)
                                 We're going around in circles... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                     "Out of drought" - (drook)

Ahead two thirds!
112 ms