Ya GOTS to hear (or re-hear some PBS recap) ... ...
As. In. Wholly Shit !!!
At Last, a cogent disbelief in String-Theory fantasies (alas also too: that one's speculation about parallel Universes which, {if they Are: wouldst needst a quite-Better ref. point than
...a Universe aka Omniverase ... full of nano- nano- pico-pico- wriggly {fucking-} Eely-Strings. I. Wot.
Bon Appetít.. youse fondly seeking some soupçon/whiff! of grandiose postulates like .. freee- {not-as-in-beer} WILL and other fantasies both too-deterministic or ____
ie bunky: PHYSICS just-may be ..NOT-deterministic, y'all.
Forum
Physicist Richard Muller on the Nature of 'Now'
The concept of now has challenged philosophers and physicists for thousands of years. Even Albert Einstein is said to have thought that "now" was outside the realm of scientific understanding. But in his new book, "Now: The Physics of Time," UC Berkeley physicist Richard Muller says that much has changed since Einstein's era and that the world is now capable of conquering the concepts of time and now. Muller argues that time, like the universe, is expanding, and what people experience as "now" is really the edge of newly-forming time. Muller joins Forum to discuss the nature of "now" and to explain why we perceive time the way we do.
As. In. Wholly Shit !!!
At Last, a cogent disbelief in String-Theory fantasies (alas also too: that one's speculation about parallel Universes which, {if they Are: wouldst needst a quite-Better ref. point than
...a Universe aka Omniverase ... full of nano- nano- pico-pico- wriggly {fucking-} Eely-Strings. I. Wot.
Bon Appetít.. youse fondly seeking some soupçon/whiff! of grandiose postulates like .. freee- {not-as-in-beer} WILL and other fantasies both too-deterministic or ____
ie bunky: PHYSICS just-may be ..NOT-deterministic, y'all.