IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 3 active users | 4 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That's not the same thing and you know it.
The Paris attacks were organised by a group of people who had to go well outside the bounds of the law to obtain their weapons.

Mexico is a country where heavily-armed drug gangs are at open war with the state.

If you think that compares in any way with people going postal with guns that are legal to buy without background checks or (if purchased at a gun show) a cooling-off period, then there's little point in continuing this line of debate.

There are 300+ mass shootings in America every year. There really aren't 300+ mass shootings in France.

But all this is so much bloviation. I asked a simple question that you've deftly evaded: are you A-OK with the current rate of gun death - howsoever caused - in America?
New yes I am ok, one little change in the law I would tweak tho
When you buy a gun (we do have background checks you know, even at gun shows) if your drivers license has the same address as your mom's, you should be denied. That will make a big dent in these things.
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
     Shootings of police officers in Dallas - (Another Scott) - (27)
         I was watching the news till midnight last night. - (a6l6e6x) - (26)
             where was the nra in 64? - (boxley) - (25)
                 Supporting passage of the Mulford Act -NT - (drook) - (24)
                     and all of these restrictions helped? how? -NT - (boxley) - (23)
                         Here's your options: - (pwhysall) - (22)
                             5.. none of the above will work as well as the other options -NT - (boxley) - (21)
                                 So do nothing? - (pwhysall) - (15)
                                     I can't speak for Box on this subject, only for me. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                         Take 9 minutes and watch this - (drook)
                                         I'm sorry for your loss. - (pwhysall) - (6)
                                             Thank you for the sympathy. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                 With you re ... A) the genocides ... B) lynchings - (Ashton)
                                             lets assume that all of your points were in place here - (boxley) - (2)
                                                 You're right, need to add one to the list - (drook) - (1)
                                                     excuse me sir, what is your name? BAM! :-) no worries, a good idea -NT - (boxley)
                                             Well said. - (Another Scott)
                                     does france have strict gun control ? How about Mexico? - (boxley) - (5)
                                         That's not the same thing and you know it. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                             yes I am ok, one little change in the law I would tweak tho - (boxley)
                                         Yeah, look at our ineffectual restrictions on grenade launchers - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                             correct, thats why the bad guys use preassure cooker bombs to do that. Note it doesnt stop them -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 You're not even trying. -NT - (rcareaga)
                                 And yet taking Tommy Guns, etc., off the streets made the US safer in the '30s. How about that? - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                     repealing prohibition made it safer, not the gun act sheesh -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                                         Maybe it's both? Maybe doing something is better than doing nothing? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             Who was surprised? -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                                 At a guess: Only Americans. -NT - (CRConrad)

Not just broken: robustly broken!
91 ms