I wish there were a better way to do these things than surveys.
Maybe the participants accurately report what they eat, but unless they have daily journal or something, it would seem to be biased against accurate reporting. But maybe it all washes out when enough people are in the study. I'm sure Martijn Katan will say "told ya!". ;-) Cheers, Scott. |
|
|
And I would have the same response :-)
-- Drew |
|
|
:-)
|
Butter is Back?
- (malraux)
- (14)
- July 6, 2016, 10:18:59 AM EDT
Bad reporting on a bad study
- (drook)
- (10)
- July 6, 2016, 11:02:19 AM EDT
Re: Bad reporting on a bad study
- (Another Scott)
- (6)
- July 6, 2016, 11:16:30 AM EDT
Not helping
- (drook)
- (5)
- July 6, 2016, 11:51:34 AM EDT
The studies look at people over a long period of time.
- (Another Scott)
- (4)
- July 6, 2016, 12:34:25 PM EDT
Re: The studies look at people over a long period of time.
- (drook)
- (3)
- July 6, 2016, 12:58:10 PM EDT
See the 2006 Long form.
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- July 6, 2016, 01:21:31 PM EDT
As bad as I thought
- (drook)
- (1)
- July 6, 2016, 02:40:11 PM EDT
Yup, prepared foods and eating out are big wild-cards.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- July 6, 2016, 03:37:25 PM EDT
LRPD: Powered by scientifically unsubstantiated energy producing capabilities!
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- (2)
- July 6, 2016, 03:13:37 PM EDT
And if someone can find a cure for it a lot of the other problems will diminish.
-NT
- (malraux)
- (1)
- July 6, 2016, 03:34:25 PM EDT
I keep looking for the phrase, "According to top Chinese and Russian scientists..."
-NT
- (drook)
- July 6, 2016, 04:09:34 PM EDT
I wish there were a better way to do these things than surveys.
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- July 6, 2016, 11:06:42 AM EDT
And I would have the same response :-)
-NT
- (drook)
- (1)
- July 6, 2016, 11:34:09 AM EDT
:-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- July 6, 2016, 11:47:06 AM EDT
