IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That too.
But it could be as simple as they didn't know or didn't believe that external crackers could do it. With all the reports in the press, e.g. "I could crack it in three weeks", they had the responsibility to check before swearing in court that only Apple could do it.

It'll be interesting to see how Congress manages to square the circle of all the competing arguments, if it's even possible.

Cheers,
Scott.
New *Mostly* that
I've seen more than enough analysis to be convinced this was entirely about setting a precedent. Given that, any change in apparent strategy should be seen in terms of what precedent will be set ... or not set.
--

Drew
     New twist in Apple -vs- The Ever-expanding-Security-Monster apparition. - (Ashton) - (3)
         They didn't want the precedent of losing in court -NT - (drook) - (2)
             That too. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 *Mostly* that - (drook)

Unfortunately, the hard part is moderation...
53 ms