IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Daily Diana^WExpress?
Horrific tabloid rag. Second only to The Daily Hitler^WMail for jingoistic right-wing xenophobic homophobic class-obsessed house-price-driven asshattery.
New (I figured as much, but it came up first so there you go. ;-)
New Bloomberg Businessweek's take.
BBW:

U.S. President Barack Obama, facing criticism at home over his Islamic State strategy, is turning out to be right with his prediction that Vladimir Putin’s own campaign in Syria will descend into a quagmire.

Many senior officials in Moscow underestimated how long the operation in support of Bashar al-Assad would take when Putin entered Syria’s civil war on Sept. 30 and no longer talk in terms of just a few months, with one saying the hope now is that it won’t last several years.

With the mission in its third month, Putin is pouring materiel and manpower into Syria at a pace unanticipated by lawmakers already struggling to meet his spending goals. The plunging price of oil is sapping revenue and prolonging Russia’s first recession in six years, prompting the Defense Ministry this week to postpone some new weapons programs.

“This operation will last a year at a minimum,” said Frants Klintsevich, deputy head of the Defense Committee in the upper house of parliament. “I was expecting more from Syria’s army.”

‘Mission Creep’

Russia initially earmarked just $1.2 billion for the war for all of 2016, an official familiar with the matter said. Outlays were running at about $4 million a day before Putin’s mid-November surge in troops and hardware, which doubled the cost to $8 million, or almost $3 billion on an annualized basis, according to the Royal United Services Institute, or RUSI, a military research group based in London.

But there’s no backing down for Putin, who vowed to destroy Islamic State for the Oct. 31 bombing of a passenger jet over Sinai that killed 224 Russians.

The Russian leader is also locked in an increasingly personal confrontation with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of supporting Islamic State through illicit oil sales, which Erdogan denies. Putin called Turkey’s downing of a Russian bomber two weeks ago “a stab in the back” that Erdogan will regret “again and again.”

“Putin will be forced to pull in more and more ground troops, further exposing them to attacks and further increasing the likelihood of mission creep,” said Joerg Forbrig, senior program director at the German Marshall Fund of the U.S. in Berlin. “One year is in no way near realistic.”

[...]

Troop Surge

Russia now has as many as 5,000 servicemen on the ground, more than double the original estimate of 2,000, according to RUSI researcher Igor Sutyagin. While Putin continues to rule out a land offensive, hundreds of advisers are already embedded with the Syrian army, he said.

Nobody in the Russian leadership is underestimating the difficulty of the challenge any more, according to Andrei Klimov, deputy head of the International Affairs Committee in the upper house of parliament.

“The threat we’re confronting is 45,000 to 50,000 fighters with military experience, fighters from Chechnya and Afghanistan, Syrian army officers that we trained ourselves.” Klimov said. “This is a very serious opponent.”


(via Kevin Drum)

Cheers,
Scott.
New The point is neither is realistic about the region.
It is a festering shithole, it has always been a festering shithole and it will always be a festering shithole. As the 80's movie said, "The only winning move is not to play."
     Putin more realistic than Obama? - (mmoffitt) - (9)
         Nope. - (Another Scott) - (8)
             Daily Diana^WExpress? - (pwhysall) - (3)
                 (I figured as much, but it came up first so there you go. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                 Bloomberg Businessweek's take. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     The point is neither is realistic about the region. - (mmoffitt)
             ROFL. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                 "Bam-Bam?" - (rcareaga) - (2)
                     "Bam-Bam?"" why would a cave dwelling baby with enormous strength be derogatory? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                         I *said* it was clever. -NT - (rcareaga)

Certainly, as long as they don't require any treatment.
51 ms