IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New -0.64
The price elasticity of demand for gasoline in the long term. If the price goes up 10%, this turns into a reduction of gasoline usage by 6% over the long run. http://economics.about.com/od/priceelasticityofdemand/a/gasoline_elast.htm

When gas hit $4, people started driving fewer miles and buying more efficient cars.

Unfortunately, gas taxes do hit the poor and middle class harder.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Regressiveness is an issue.
It can be handled, though, by cutting taxes in other areas. E.g. Make the gas tax a percentage of the price instead of $0.18/gal or whatever it is in your locality. Reduce the sales tax by an amount to make it revenue neutral in that locality. Make up the difference, if any, by increasing property taxes on homes valued at over $1M (or whatever number makes sense in a particular area).

It's not an insurmountable problem, and as you show, making gas (and coal and oil and natural gas) more expensive to burn will cause people to use less of it and make renewables/solar/wind relatively cheaper.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Box's favorite climate researcher has a new "discussion paper" out. - (Another Scott) - (5)
         global taxes again, whats his attraction to global taxes? -NT - (boxley) - (4)
             Simple. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 wealth transfer from the 1% to the wannabee 1% meanwhile poor people get screwed again - (boxley) - (2)
                     -0.64 - (malraux) - (1)
                         Regressiveness is an issue. - (Another Scott)

Carpe per diem.
42 ms