If there's enough light reaching the sensors, and the sensors are fast enough, then more pixels are better (assuming the lenses don't limit the resolution, of course). There's more flexibility.
Yeah, ~ 14 million good pixels are comparable to a good 35 mm film, but who was it that was singing the praises of a 41 MP Nokia?
;-)
Cheers,
Scott.
(More at DPReview. The comments point out lots of potential issues with this camera (e.g. dynamic range) but no cameras are perfect and it may be great for billboard-sized landscape prints. There's no way I'm getting one of these, even if I win the lottery - but maybe it'll help push down their other FF cameras a little faster.)
Yeah, ~ 14 million good pixels are comparable to a good 35 mm film, but who was it that was singing the praises of a 41 MP Nokia?
;-)
Cheers,
Scott.
(More at DPReview. The comments point out lots of potential issues with this camera (e.g. dynamic range) but no cameras are perfect and it may be great for billboard-sized landscape prints. There's no way I'm getting one of these, even if I win the lottery - but maybe it'll help push down their other FF cameras a little faster.)