Moreover, we ALREADY HAVE A NATIONAL SINGLE PAYER PLAN THAT WORKS AND COVERS ABOUT HALF OF ALL CURRENT MEDICAL EXPENSES. It just doesn't "kick in" until age 65.
HTH.
HTH.
Clue: Canada != USA.
Moreover, we ALREADY HAVE A NATIONAL SINGLE PAYER PLAN THAT WORKS AND COVERS ABOUT HALF OF ALL CURRENT MEDICAL EXPENSES. It just doesn't "kick in" until age 65. HTH. |
One for MM - SmartyPants: Vermont gives up on Single Payer.
- (Another Scott)
- (9)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 12:13:59 AM EST
Can't be done by individual states. It has to be national. For a variety of reasons. YOU KNOW THAT.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 08:23:37 AM EST
Yet Canada started province by province. Hmm... ;-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 09:49:55 AM EST
Clue: Canada != USA.
- (mmoffitt)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 09:52:05 AM EST
And while we're on the topic...
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 10:02:12 AM EST
Re: And while we're on the topic...
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 11:08:14 AM EST
Heh!
- (mmoffitt)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 01:31:15 PM EST
since I manage my own plan here is the problem
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 11:33:45 AM EST
And *THAT* is why one state cannot implement Single Payer here.
- (mmoffitt)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 01:33:31 PM EST
11.5%?
- (scoenye)
- Dec. 18, 2014, 06:49:48 PM EST
