IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New A more generic tool...
There's something called the "NRL Protocol Analyzer" that seems to have a lot of math behind it. A 12 page mini-tutorial PDF describing it, what it does, how it works, is here. (The PPT version is here.)

It's from the mid-'90s. There are undoubtedly more powerful tools now, but sometimes it helps to take a step back.

(This stuff is outside my area. I just thought I'd mention it in case you haven't seen it.)

HTH a little. Good luck!

Cheers,
Scott.
New good link, thanks
not looking for secure communications, no such animal. Thinking about unbreakable local encryption. Checking a few more things then start writing.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 59 years. meep
New There is only one unbreakable cypher
And that's an OTP.

Everything else will fall to analysis or brute force.
New my idea is to create an EOTP
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 59 years. meep
New Two things.
1. Use OTP once! Otherwise, it's NOT a one time pad.

2. OTP relies on having a truly random number as long the data you want to protect.

That brings me to the following quote:
“The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.”—Robert R. Coveyou

There have been "pseudo-random number generators" that were very insecure.
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
New Or in related puzzlements,
The generation of sane, viable societies is too important to be left to ordinary humans.

But I don't know where that Leaves us, in any next.. :-/
New It is mainly a key transport problem
Any electronic transport method is vulnerable in one way or another. The security of the OTP is reduced to the level of the method used to transport the key. That is why there still is no viable electronic OTP. Even the method I posted earlier still requires a secure physical meeting between each pair of messengers.
     geriactic brain needs some input regards encryption - (boxley) - (20)
         First step in writing your own encryption algorithm ... - (drook) - (2)
             And this... :-) -NT - (scoenye)
             In other words: - (static)
         It is different - (scoenye) - (9)
             Ah, a usefull reply - (boxley) - (8)
                 Hey, mine was useful! - (drook) - (1)
                     Me too. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                 Something like this? - (scoenye) - (2)
                     Love. It. Best hopeful-Aha! in a long time :-) - (Ashton)
                     enough like it to require a licence :-( -NT - (boxley)
                 What's wrong with cipher block chaining? -NT - (static) - (2)
                     As used in SSLv3/TLS1.0 - (scoenye) - (1)
                         Ah. Understood. -NT - (static)
         A more generic tool... - (Another Scott) - (6)
             good link, thanks - (boxley) - (5)
                 There is only one unbreakable cypher - (pwhysall) - (4)
                     my idea is to create an EOTP -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                         Two things. - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                             Or in related puzzlements, - (Ashton)
                             It is mainly a key transport problem - (scoenye)

This is only a test.
99 ms