IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Test-icle
92U235 ... Can I write the NSA yet?

Nope.

Hmm..

92U235 ... the all-sub subroutine?
Except that [big], [small} no workee either, so that 235 will be unapothegmatic. But it'll do.
Expand Edited by Ashton June 2, 2014, 06:29:57 PM EDT
New Re: Test-icle
92U235

Because I'm tricky... tricky, tricky, tricky...

Of course, here it is inline with more text 92U235 and I imagine it is not really what you want.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
New Tricky.
New Seems a lot of foofaraw to (still not evade)
the necessity of starting a sentence with [sub] or [sub][sub] and going from there, mindful that (1) + (-1) == (0)
Still, I !=grok why simple [sup] be gone; [sub] isn't 'gone' (along with some semblance of [big], [small]..)
Something like a Style-sheet designed by a Perlmonk on Bolivian Blue-flake, in a blackout as the UPS chirps-out the remaining seconds

Guess it's all a part of Man *nix, where the how-to definitions are compressed and the execution demands
reinventing your [symbol space?] one-line-at-a-time.

Which is fine.. if one is paid by the hour.
(Could this-all be a conspiracy-of-coders: to make damn-sure the nobody in a Suit could crack it?)
Of Course too! ... entirely trivial compared with the bitchin-99%-boffo, eh?

Carrion..
New It is not in the allowed...
HTML. and is filtered out.

The Wee Codes we were so used to ... just are not there anymore.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
New Simple oversight, and a typo.
92U235

I had entered "super" instead of "sup". Whoops. Check your work, Anderson...
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Indeedly!
Here it is inline 92U235 with a sentence.

Poifect!
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
New Appropriate kudo(e?)s in Suggestions :-)
I jes knowed ya wouldn't go-all-arbitrary on us'ns jes cause ya gots that Root-PW n'stuff.. and could..
mark all our cuss-words, if'n ya wanted ta be Puritan n'such.

(I be all envy at yer 99.99 %Not-typo(e?)s. The little grey cells concur.

;^->
     Test-icle - (Ashton) - (7)
         Re: Test-icle - (folkert) - (6)
             Tricky. -NT - (Another Scott)
             Seems a lot of foofaraw to (still not evade) - (Ashton) - (4)
                 It is not in the allowed... - (folkert)
                 Simple oversight, and a typo. - (malraux) - (2)
                     Indeedly! - (folkert)
                     Appropriate kudo(e?)s in Suggestions :-) - (Ashton)

You hijacked the conversation. You get to land it.
76 ms