nocturnal emission) ;^>

The crass is now the norm; even those seeking (only) 'recognition' rather than Direct C-notes are within that Crass Club;
While there may be other reasons within any discovered example, varying from simple ineptness to omnipresent sloth, IMO we cannot grok this topic to fullness without first
introducing, Cui bono? aka Who profits? via accepting as a factoid any of these billboards wrapped in Official-sounding parchment.

(I Mean--base-motives are everywhere; recall the various tales of Pauling's efforts (while sick, in bed) to proceed from his hastily-scrawled
helical-DNA 'What-if?' into a more refined/complete form/simultaneously the efforts of C & W to Publish First, etc.)
(Pauling's passport delay via HUAC-infested State Department, doesn't fit any pattern of knowing-turpitude, it seems, but clearly that delay alone might have cost him #1 aka Discoverer.)
Mix-in the plight of the un-Credited x-ray crystallographer who gave the pair The Clue, and we see clearly the Bono-part: fame; more al-punte: 'Second' is nil in such WInner-take-all sweepstakes.

Just like with journalists and their employers. Is not our whole National Identity based upon,
He who is not One-Up is One-Down. [??]
--Alistair Sim in School for Scoundrels ... Lifetime-supply of them around.

So you need to do diligent-BPP, all the while seeking motives for premeditated skullduggery--even if it all just seems classic-sloth or BS to fill space.
Right?
Maybe she thought this point goes-without-saying?

PS: presume you've seen (rebroadcast tonight, here);


On the Media

Battling Bad Science
Stories about new innovations in health appear almost daily in the media, but the claims are frequently overblown, misleading or completely false. In a TED talk from July, 2011, journalist Ben Goldacre talks about how to spot and avoid bad science.


also the goddledygook link: http://www.ottawacit...757736/story.html

{sigh} ..so many memes; so little closure :-0