IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Kathleen Geier at WaMo: On the return of the Mugwumps.
http://www.washingto...m_frank049978.php

Everything old is new again...

Yesterday, when I wrote about a White House gathering of young billionaire philanthropists, I did so with a healthy dose of snark. However, I didn’t make an argument about the many things that are terribly wrong with government-by-billionaire. But if you’re interested in reading such an argument, you’re in luck. Tom Frank has written one that was posted at Salon.com today, and it’s excellent.

In his piece, Frank makes a smart historical analogy between today’s reformist billionaires like Michael Bloomberg, and the sanctimonious “Mugwumps” the nineteenth century:

[...]


A good read. As is Frank's piece, of course.

Cheers,
Scott.
New She chose the exactly-right Word! Kudos to her.

The jocular word mugwump, noted as early as 1832, is from Algonquian (Natick) mugquomp, "important person, kingpin" (from mugumquomp, "war leader")[1] implying that they were "sanctimonious" or "holier-than-thou,"[2] in holding themselves aloof from party politics.


via Wikipedia's take.

Will peruse the play anon, when I can stand one-More 'symptom' of..
     Kathleen Geier at WaMo: On the return of the Mugwumps. - (Another Scott) - (1)
         She chose the exactly-right Word! Kudos to her. - (Ashton)

It was a good party...
31 ms