IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New What about file sizes?
Apparently, OO saves in XML format. I'm a mite concerned that a Word file takes up almost 700k, while the same document imported and then saved in OO format takes up only about 200k. I suppose I expect a certain amount of bloat and crap from an MS application, but it seems a rather radical difference.

New That sounds about right
Try the same file saved as:
  • .DOC
  • .RTF
  • .TXT
  • .HTML
  • .SDW (StarOffice binary)
  • .SDX (OpenOffice XML)


My results on a one-page document:
22k foo.sdw
19k foo.doc
9.0k foo.rtf
8.0k foo.sxw
7.0k foo.html
4.0k foo.txt
--
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]
[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]]
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

   Keep software free.     Oppose the CBDTPA.     Kill S.2048 dead.
[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/...a_alert.html]]
New Take a look here...
[link|http://home.attbi.com/~greg.folkert|My Resume Page]

You'll notice that same thing...

These files all were from the same source, all saved from OO.

Format        Bytes  Filename
OpenPDF       6,131  gfolkert.pdf
HTML          9,368  gfolkert.html
OpenOffice1  10,420  gfolkert.sxw
AdobePDF     12,660  gfolkert.adb.pdf
RichText     18,928  gfolkert.rtf
MSWord       27,648  gfolkert.doc
StarOffice5  36,864  gfolkert.sdw
PostScript   45,781  gfolkert.ps


What surprises me most, is the PDF versions.

greg, curley95@attbi.com -- REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!
New 'Nother bizarre happenstance.
The original Word 97 document I'm working with has been about 680k. Yesterday, I worked on it for a bit, started to save it to a floppy so I could bring it in to work, and lo and behold, it is 1.18MB! WTF?-1.0.

So I open it here at work, type in a space, and then save it. Back down to 680k. WTF?-2.1.

This is not comforting to me.

BTW, I think I need to bag using OpenOffice on this one. It's causing too many weird things to happen. Like a page ending about 2/3 of the way down and defying all attempts to make it do otherwise.
New Fast Save?
For a few versions of Word, Fast Save defaulted On in the options. This was a problem for several reasons. First, by adding changes to the end of the file, it made documents inordinately larger than necessary whilst not saving a great deal of time saving them. Secondly, it made the document format more fragile than necessary. Thirdly, it meant deleted text was still present in the file! This was fuel for a number of embarrassing episodes in the last decade. And lastly, the extra complexity to the format meant it took anti-virus vendors longer than they liked to be able to clean documents of macro virii..

In short, Fast Save was one of Microsoft's silent fiascos. Fortunately, more recent versions seem to default it to Off, but the option is still offered.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

New That suppurating POS still lives? Chris <<< \ufffdbersoft Alert
I recall that in Word6, and the immediate tip to NEVER leave it on.. and you think it defaults to on, in some cases? Damn.. I rarely have to use it, and never 97 - so I also forgot about it.

Have to add to reminders list then, for others. I've forgotten what mischief it caused initially before I asked around, but the deleted-text part is bad enough (along with the included personal spyware S/N). And those bastards never got around to either fixing or removing it ?! I can hear their tiny cast-nylon brain gears squeaking now:

Gosh if we removed it, someone might think we made a mistake - better leave it in and let helpdesk handle it

(or... the Other Help Desk\ufffd work it into a week's worth of acid barbs with Clippy ??)

Somebody: Please Roast the #*%&*$ to about 8000\ufffd K <<<


Ashton
another pin in the Billy Doll - a rusty one from the stable.
     Hath anyone experience with OpenOffice? - (acagle) - (26)
         Talked about a couple times - (tseliot)
         Re: Hath anyone experience with OpenOffice? - (bepatient)
         Can't wait for it to be ported to OS X... -NT - (tjsinclair)
         Aye - (Yendor) - (8)
             OpenOffice 1.0 Killa Feecha (On Linux, anyhow) - (pwhysall) - (7)
                 Re: OpenOffice 1.0 Killa Feecha (On Linux, anyhow) - (acagle) - (2)
                     If you do that - - (Ashton)
                     Quit feeding me nostalgia - (wharris2)
                 Not happenin' on Windows - (kmself) - (2)
                     I'll have to check out TightVNC - (tonytib) - (1)
                         Inflection points - (kmself)
                 Re: OpenOffice 1.0 Killa Feecha (On Linux, anyhow) - (folkert)
         What about file sizes? - (acagle) - (5)
             That sounds about right - (kmself)
             Take a look here... - (folkert)
             'Nother bizarre happenstance. - (acagle) - (2)
                 Fast Save? - (static) - (1)
                     That suppurating POS still lives? Chris <<< \ufffdbersoft Alert - (Ashton)
         Updates. - (acagle)
         And why the F*$#. . . . . - (acagle) - (3)
             Naive suggestion (?) - (Ashton) - (2)
                 I thought of that. - (acagle) - (1)
                     Depends. - (inthane-chan)
         Killa Feecha #2 - (tseliot) - (2)
             That's doable in Word - (drewk) - (1)
                 Ah, thanks for the tip! -NT - (tseliot)

I don't think mammals are meant to eat reptiles.
57 ms