I knew the reason from the beginning

Post #38,461 by drewk 5/13/02 11:40:40 AM Reply	I knew the reason from the beginning And her "solution" was wrong for a different reason than what everyone else seems to be focusing on: If teachers had a problem with "freaking" they should have passed a rule against that. Checking the undergarments of students who may or may not have planned to engage in the activity would have no effect on the students who did plan to. The teachers who don't want to chaperone any more, did they say anything about undergarments? If not, why was that the target of the response? Did the vice-principal think to simply tell students that anyone seen freaking at the dance would be kicked out? === I can't be a Democrat because I like to spend the money I make. I can't be a Republican because I like to spend the money I make on drugs and whores.
Post #38,469 by Brandioch 5/13/02 12:52:15 PM 5/13/02 12:54:00 PM Reply	Why not just post "no inappropriate displays"? Ditto. Why check for undies when you can just boot the kids? -Edit- And she's a nut anyway if she thinks that no thongs mean no butt showing. "Wedgie" Edited by Brandioch May 13, 2002, 12:54:00 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #38,471 by boxley 5/13/02 1:11:45 PM Reply	access via thong easier than wedgie although to be fair she shoulda had the boys whip it out to make sure the plastic hat was in place. Otherwise, lights on and any two "stuck" together tossed out. thanx, bill TAM ARIS QUAM ARMIPOTENS

Welcome to IWETHEY!