IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New So then, what should the National Org. of Geek Consumers do
about Apple™? (Er, not-just-because they already have too much gelt to actually count (imagine how many years to count 1011 bills.))

The new iMacs pay The Price for unnecessarily-shrunk cases--for no practical reason whatsoever ... except the bogus use of the same rationale as for Macbooks
(they benefit from compact size: Duh.)
Ergo, the only Corporate reason for the shrinkage? a say, putative 'need' ~to fit the boards into the world's biggest lap-top: but why shrink iMac further--on a desktop!??
Clearly to justify their guaranteed monopoly over any present/future memory upgrade, thus to force everyone to buy at their [the world knows:] ludicrously overpriced memory fees.

Geeks are alleged to be 'smarter than your average turnip'; the very appellation is a diss: reflecting a Dumbth Society who ƒeare smarter people, and invent (dumbth-grade) ridicule ... accordingly.

ie.
How does one? go about organizing a (threatened? actual?) Geek-boycott/variant of a mondo-greedy Microsoft II, in order to chasten these Armani-suited extortionists.
Or are most geeks so enamored of Shiny/shiny that They Will Pay Anything.. er, forever? no matter how blatant IS the *rip-off?

* That it is pure rip-off is, I presume self-evident: there is NO 'value-add'/no special-fab involved in their memory 'quality'; in fact, the opposite of (some pricey hi-tech "design or special QC" excuse):
It is a matter of record that, like Walmart they bully everyone/in any country to get even lower unit prices than anyone else--for identical devices.
(And the Japan article limns that, like M$'s sordid affair of effectively provoking the early death of Ed Curry by reneging upon construction funds he had advanced 'on promise':
Apple will throw one country's innovative sub-contractor under their bus--once they grok the production secrets--and chisel down YAN China supplier.)
Just another form of death-dealing, I wot.

So then; do they not Earn the sobriquet, Redmond II ??
Is there then, enough (any??) solidarity amidst the techno-literati? Any at all?
This IS Theater! Even I can think of many forms that such a protest might take--[n+1] Ways to embarrass
the greedheads where it hurts: Legitimately besmirching their trendy (now-coasting-on-Jobs' icon) 'pretty toys' rep--as an excuse to Overprice a commodity simply because They Can.

Would the CIEIO like to see public discussion of the scam-part of their bizness--here very clear;
everyone can discover volume-pricing for memory, all of which had better have a decent MTBF. Etc.
Apple can 'infer' the high cost' of 'design', of in-built prettiness etc. You can't check their %profit on most aspects.
On this: you Can.
But in trying to justify the gouging for this commodity: they. no. verbs. Rest case.

Whom do 'we' hire for the Stage Production launch rehearsal next?
(I may be missing something, but to me it seems that: this particular GOUGE has legs, especially for all those who ever HATED an overt rip-off 'about-which-they-could-do-Nada'..

Don't >You?<
New Apple is a premium brand.
I think it's good that they're pushing design and packaging. They've had a mania for years about more efficient processors (a big reason why they dumped the PowerPC chips, and why we haven't seen an AMD-powered Mac). They've pushed packaging on SSDs. They pushed the nano-SIM standard, smaller connectors, etc. Yeah, another big part of the reason is to have more control over the hardware, but it also helps the industry by pushing new standards.

Using less metal, less packaging, smaller power supplies, less power, benefits us all. I don't begrudge Apple earning big profits in the process.

I like the fact that Apple pushed reasonably priced high-resolution displays into relatively inexpensive devices. Remember when you had to spend $2k or more for a 1600x1200 LCD laptop from IBM/Lenovo when just about everyone else was putting 1024x768 screens on 15 or 17" laptops? Remember when Intel's great idea for a laptop that ran more than 2 hours off the battery was an Atom with a 1024x600 screen? Laptops stagnated for far too long until Apple made a serious push with the MacBook Pros.

I do begrudge our system of letting Apple accumulate huge bank balances without taxing them at a sensible rate. But that's our representatives' doing, not just Apple's.

Apple's PCs are a bit like cars these days. They'll last a long time, and you have to pay a premium if you want a new one. But you can get decent ones on the used market that still have a lot of life in them. And you can get tricked-out ones directly from Apple's Refurbished store if you look around; you get the same warranty and will spend substantially less than new - e.g. http://store.apple.c...deals/mac/imac/27 They also have a (small) discount for certain groups (as Dell and Lenovo and most likely some others do).

PCs are reliable enough these days that little should go wrong with them, hardware wise, in 3-5 years. (Unless you buy one that is so cheap that the motherboard has bad caps or the power supply is full of junk components, etc.) If Apple wants to dip their motherboards in amber to seal them up, that's Ok with me if it does what I want for a reasonably long period of time for a reasonable price. If they charge $200 for adding 8 GB of RAM to their fastest 27" iMac, that sucks, but you're also paying them the cost of customizing it (even if it does take an extra 5 seconds to pick and install it - it's not free). I wouldn't want to try to take apart any all-in-one PC whether it had accessible RAM/SSD slots or not. (And putting doors on the back is nice, but it's a compromise that few people need for something they might use once.)

J is still uses her 2008 black 2.4 GHz MacBook every day - http://www.everymac....penryn-specs.html I upped the RAM to 6 GB (its max) and added a Crucial M4 SSD. It's nice to have been able to do that and it's got a lot of life in it yet (hardware wise - probably not OS-wise). But I also got her a refurbished 11" MacBook Air a year or so ago. The black MB is too heavy to drag around on trips, etc., while the Air is great for that. Yeah, it sucks that RAM can't be added to the Air later, but every cc and every gram is a premium in that box.

IOW, yeah it sucks, but that's the price of progress. And progress is good. :-)

Cheers,
Scott.
New Since you dont have a say in Ireland Tax revenue
why do you grudge anything :-)
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New US corporations should pay US taxes.
New not the money making portion
http://www.forbes.co...w-ordinary-it-is/
Just imagine if Apple could replace all those tax lawyers with creative new software geeks or industrial designers. It might win back some of the market share it has been losing to Android in recent years.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New eh? bought my first max to avoid the gates tax
bought my last one when I could get the same hardware for less than 1/3 of the price.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
     So then, what should the National Org. of Geek Consumers do - (Ashton) - (5)
         Apple is a premium brand. - (Another Scott) - (3)
             Since you dont have a say in Ireland Tax revenue - (boxley) - (2)
                 US corporations should pay US taxes. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     not the money making portion - (boxley)
         eh? bought my first max to avoid the gates tax - (boxley)

Ahead two thirds!
63 ms