Ya lost me.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #373,129 by mmoffitt 3/29/13 3:16:19 PM Reply	Ya lost me. Note that the assumption they were making wasn't that you were getting married to have children, you were getting married to have sex. You don't care about Rubella results if you're only going to have sex. You care about Rubella results only if there's going to be a fetus. Sherif Girgis makes a pretty good case here in defense of traditional marriage: http://www.c-spanvid.../program/310722-1
Post #373,134 by drook 3/29/13 4:20:54 PM Reply	Repeat after me: syphilis It's why they started doing it. If you're going to make some point about the blood test "proving" what the "intent" of marriage "traditionally" is, you have to be talking about the reason they started doing it. Not the reasons they added on after. -- Drew
Post #373,137 by boxley 3/29/13 4:44:13 PM Reply	Marriage is because syphillis? kewl :-) Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
Post #373,160 by mmoffitt 3/30/13 10:52:14 AM Reply	Okay. They started Rubella testing because there was the presumption that marriage => children. Better?
Post #373,162 by crazy 3/30/13 11:04:41 AM Reply	Another slice off the shifting platform Don't want to be seen (don't care if you are) as a bigot (no matter how many passes you get from box when you doth protest so loudly) so you moved to the protect the fragile people who's lives will be destroyed when they see a gay couple kissing (ooo, how'd that statement FEEL. Gut level disgust. 2 gay GUYS now, not hot chicks). See how I don't need to bother to respond when you misquote other people to support your silliness? They show up and point out your bullshit sooner or later. kiss kiss.
Post #373,163 by drook 3/30/13 11:08:55 AM Reply	Marriage leads to children != marriage is for children -- Drew
Post #373,164 by crazy 3/30/13 11:12:54 AM Reply	Yup Too bad some people don't understand cause and effect, at least as represented by stats.

ScotusBlog: USSC to punt on Prop 8 case. - (Another Scott) - (61) - March 26, 2013, 12:06:54 PM EDT

no standing sounds like the correct legal ruling -NT - (boxley) - March 26, 2013, 12:49:15 PM EDT

What century? - (mmoffitt) - (35) - March 27, 2013, 09:37:17 AM EDT

Ok, it was a slight exaggeration. - (Another Scott) - (5) - March 26, 2013, 07:01:16 PM EDT

whats wrong with first cousins? looks around nervously -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 26, 2013, 07:21:54 PM EDT

I figured someone would question that... - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 07:55:52 PM EDT

Well, sometimes we do - (mhuber) - (2) - March 26, 2013, 08:34:53 PM EDT

I was best man in a Catholic marriage. - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 08:46:17 PM EDT

I forgot to make my point - (mhuber) - March 26, 2013, 09:52:49 PM EDT

Fundamental changes in the definition of marriage are good - (drook) - (27) - March 26, 2013, 09:06:47 PM EDT

:-) -NT - (Another Scott) - March 26, 2013, 09:43:40 PM EDT

+ 11teen; almost forgot about TT! Thanx for reminder.. -NT - (Ashton) - March 27, 2013, 01:24:29 AM EDT

You're entitled to that view. - (mmoffitt) - (24) - March 27, 2013, 10:29:00 AM EDT

Its truly about "spousal" benefits. - (folkert) - (23) - March 27, 2013, 11:19:07 AM EDT

What rights does California deny same-sex couples? - (mmoffitt) - (22) - March 27, 2013, 11:55:26 AM EDT

Separate But Equal is not equal justice under law. - (Another Scott) - (21) - March 27, 2013, 12:13:57 PM EDT

Thank you. I was going to trot that out. - (folkert) - (2) - March 27, 2013, 12:50:02 PM EDT

Just at a semantic level - (drook) - (1) - March 27, 2013, 02:23:41 PM EDT

Excellent point! -NT - (folkert) - March 27, 2013, 03:36:29 PM EDT

Red Herring. - (mmoffitt) - (17) - March 27, 2013, 03:14:15 PM EDT

Uhh ... no - (drook) - (6) - March 27, 2013, 05:31:39 PM EDT

Actually, I do agree with your second sentence. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - March 28, 2013, 08:59:57 AM EDT

Yes, but ... - (drook) - (3) - March 28, 2013, 09:53:49 AM EDT

It's really not that difficult. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 28, 2013, 10:19:02 AM EDT

Theory vs. practice - (drook) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 10:25:15 AM EDT

Lawyers - and I - would like that. - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 10:36:15 AM EDT

Cool, I agree with you - (crazy) - March 28, 2013, 09:55:04 AM EDT

Misinformed - (boxley) - (7) - March 27, 2013, 05:35:44 PM EDT

There are corner cases where DNA is problematic. - (Another Scott) - March 27, 2013, 06:15:02 PM EDT

If procreation isn't involved, why blood tests? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5) - March 28, 2013, 09:04:50 AM EDT

I'm not your lawyer - (crazy) - (4) - March 28, 2013, 09:46:11 AM EDT

A typically non-responsive response. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 28, 2013, 09:46:29 AM EDT

kiss kiss - (crazy) - March 28, 2013, 09:56:35 AM EDT

And YOU responded it is not an issue in above post - (crazy) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 10:04:20 AM EDT

Heh. 2 more posts and still no answer to the question. -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 10:20:06 AM EDT

WTF???? Eugenics boards next? - (crazy) - (1) - March 28, 2013, 01:05:50 AM EDT

Haven't you heard? - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2013, 09:03:41 AM EDT

maybe not to the euros normal in other cultures -NT - (boxley) - March 27, 2013, 09:43:13 AM EDT

Mann at AngryBear says Goldstein at ScotusBlog is wrong. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 27, 2013, 07:05:01 PM EDT

interesting read - (boxley) - March 27, 2013, 09:39:50 PM EDT

Tom Levenson's take at Balloon-Juice. - (Another Scott) - (21) - March 28, 2013, 07:29:29 PM EDT

I hope that wasn't directed at me. - (mmoffitt) - (19) - March 29, 2013, 08:57:27 AM EDT

so she has to pay 350k because she was banging another chick - (boxley) - (3) - March 29, 2013, 09:38:26 AM EDT

I see a "wrong" compounded. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 29, 2013, 01:33:00 PM EDT

nope, you are not a racist, I get that - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2013, 01:41:00 PM EDT

s/stealing from rich/recovering stolen from/ -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 30, 2013, 10:50:45 AM EDT

Unfortunate fact of our legal system - (drook) - (10) - March 29, 2013, 09:41:24 AM EDT

Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2013, 10:48:48 AM EDT

You're almost too easy. Your link is sufficient. - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 29, 2013, 01:01:53 PM EDT

Your "tradition" goes back ... three generations? - (drook) - (7) - March 29, 2013, 02:35:19 PM EDT

Ya lost me. - (mmoffitt) - (6) - March 29, 2013, 03:16:19 PM EDT

Repeat after me: syphilis - (drook) - (5) - March 29, 2013, 04:20:54 PM EDT

Marriage is because syphillis? kewl :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 29, 2013, 04:44:13 PM EDT

Okay. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 30, 2013, 10:52:14 AM EDT

Another slice off the shifting platform - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:04:41 AM EDT

Marriage leads to children != marriage is *for* children -NT - (drook) - (1) - March 30, 2013, 11:08:55 AM EDT

Yup - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:12:54 AM EDT

It was part of the discussion. - (Another Scott) - March 29, 2013, 10:51:14 AM EDT

I stopped reading at this point - (crazy) - (2) - March 29, 2013, 12:25:56 PM EDT

Zing. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 29, 2013, 01:02:40 PM EDT

Yup, thanks where he corrects you. AGAIN. - (crazy) - March 30, 2013, 11:14:48 AM EDT

As to Why Marry? and ... it's All about the cheeldrun? - (Ashton) - March 29, 2013, 05:47:26 PM EDT

Thothe boilth you have on your fathe are jutht in-THANE!
76 ms