IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Re: Suppose this will help?
Post #372,275
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
3/7/13 6:34:47 PM
Reply
New Re: Suppose this will help?
Paul declared total victory.

Now he wants to know why it took so long to get the answer he wanted.
Alex
Post #372,281
by Another Scott
3/7/13 9:24:10 PM
Reply
New Yeah, I saw that. He don't understand too good, I guess.
He was also the guy who told Hillary that had he been president, he would have fired her. Apparently without understanding that:

1) She's from a different political party, so had he been president she probably wouldn't have picked to be Secretary of State in the first place.

2) He would only have been president during the Benghazi episode if he had won the election in 2008. His father couldn't beat McCain during that campaign. He campaigned for Ron, but had never run for office himself before his 2010 campaign for Senate (announced in May 2009). He had less chance than Pat Buchanan of being elected president then.

His inflated self image is only rivaled by his deflated understanding.

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.

     Drum on the Dronzzzze memo. - (Another Scott) - (40) - Feb. 6, 2013, 07:52:53 AM EST
         if we kill everyone who doesnt like us, - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2013, 08:39:34 AM EST
             naomi wolf's take - (boxley) - Feb. 6, 2013, 09:08:18 AM EST
         I hope you're being satirical - (hnick) - (32) - Feb. 6, 2013, 09:27:30 AM EST
             No, I'm not being satirical. - (Another Scott) - (31) - Feb. 6, 2013, 10:17:42 AM EST
                 apples, oranges? - (hnick) - (14) - Feb. 6, 2013, 10:55:15 AM EST
                     Now whose glasses are getting rosy? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2013, 11:07:23 AM EST
                         Eh, I don't have a lot of illusions about success... - (hnick) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2013, 11:15:26 AM EST
                             Point taken. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 6, 2013, 11:23:43 AM EST
                     Re: blew away a Japanese admiral - (a6l6e6x) - (10) - Feb. 6, 2013, 05:34:12 PM EST
                         Didn't say there was anything wrong with it. - (hnick) - (9) - Feb. 6, 2013, 06:24:28 PM EST
                             Re: Yamamoto - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Feb. 7, 2013, 03:32:48 PM EST
                                 The Japanese had a lot of structural problems. - (Andrew Grygus) - Feb. 8, 2013, 12:47:42 AM EST
                                 Excellent book.. herewith an interesting 'review' - (Ashton) - (2) - Feb. 8, 2013, 04:19:02 PM EST
                                     Wow - (drook) - Feb. 8, 2013, 04:50:20 PM EST
                                     Very nice find! Thanks. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Feb. 9, 2013, 12:24:12 AM EST
                             Our 'culture of death' - (Ashton) - (3) - March 7, 2013, 07:11:50 PM EST
                                 Nit - (drook) - (2) - March 7, 2013, 07:45:11 PM EST
                                     Re: Re: Nit - (folkert) - (1) - March 7, 2013, 09:43:29 PM EST
                                         Wrong cause/effect - (drook) - March 8, 2013, 08:44:42 AM EST
                 protect the nation from any imminent threat of attack - (boxley) - (11) - Feb. 6, 2013, 11:45:10 AM EST
                     Innocents die in war. Film at 11. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (10) - Feb. 6, 2013, 11:58:41 AM EST
                         At least the trains run on time. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:01:33 PM EST
                             Read me in my posts. What's your alternative? -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:08:06 PM EST
                         Innocents targeted deliberately die in war. yes they do -NT - (boxley) - (7) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:11:29 PM EST
                             Eh? - (Another Scott) - (6) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:17:43 PM EST
                                 Well that's OK then - (drook) - (4) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:20:37 PM EST
                                     What's the alternative you're proposing? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:29:18 PM EST
                                         Wasn't my point - (drook) - (2) - Feb. 6, 2013, 01:59:59 PM EST
                                             Maybe I'm being dense... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 6, 2013, 02:21:43 PM EST
                                                 Oh boy... - (hnick) - Feb. 6, 2013, 04:41:08 PM EST
                                 This Ibrahim al Banna? - (boxley) - Feb. 6, 2013, 12:59:51 PM EST
                 This didn't take long - (hnick) - (3) - March 5, 2013, 07:13:51 PM EST
                     Heh. -NT - (Another Scott) - March 5, 2013, 07:41:48 PM EST
                     2nd pool for the first oops -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 5, 2013, 08:13:23 PM EST
                         I don't like betting on your demise. -NT - (folkert) - March 5, 2013, 11:58:51 PM EST
         BBC News: PJ Crowley on Drones. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 10, 2013, 10:09:43 AM EST
             Crowley makes his points in Real English, concisely too. -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 10, 2013, 10:23:27 PM EST
         Yet more from Holder. - (Another Scott) - (2) - March 7, 2013, 02:54:18 PM EST
             Re: Suppose this will help? - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - March 7, 2013, 06:34:47 PM EST
                 Yeah, I saw that. He don't understand too good, I guess. - (Another Scott) - March 7, 2013, 09:24:10 PM EST

So less could be more, more could be less, and nothing could be most of all — sometimes.
164 ms