IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Fallows: More from Polk on Afghanistan and parallels...
http://www.theatlant...-a-critic/273520/

A good, but depressingly realistic, read.

Cheers,
Scott.
New I'm just going to point out that..
Friends I have that are still in the Military Reserves... some in special units.

They just got officially notified they are all being activated for long terms and are heading to Afghanistan.

I don't really know why or what... that is all they've been told.
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
New AFAIK...
We're still going to be there in the 10s of thousands until the end of 2014. I'm not surprised that they're still doing call-ups.

Of course, Karzai is now kicking US troops out of Wardak Province, so I wouldn't be surprised if the post-2014 plans are further revised... :-/

The "military strategy" folks in the Pentagon always seem to be scheming to have our soldiers stay in places like this as long as possible. I expect Obama will do everything he can to have as many US people out of Afghanistan by the end of 2014 as possible. Presumably the CIA and others will have a presence, but I expect our footprint in 2015 and later to be small. (NATO and others may still have a non-zero presence.) I think Obama recognizes that there's no upside for us having troops there (and any counter-terrorism stuff can be done with a very small footprint).

If Karzai thinks he can survive without us being there, more power to him. If Pakistan thinks they will be more secure without us being there, more power to them. The people living there need to step up and run their own countries - we're not going to turn Afghanistan into a modern economy and a multi-party democracy unless the people there want us to...

We'll see what happens.

:-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New Consequence of Carter's blunder.
If we had locked arms with the Soviets in 1979 and rolled through Afghanistan with them (leaving an empowered Soviet State or three in the wake) the world would be a lot better place. What else would have been necessary, of course, is that we couldn't have had Ronnie Raygun simultaneously spending the USSR and the USA out of existence.
New Well that's an interesting take! :-/
     Fallows: More from Polk on Afghanistan and parallels... - (Another Scott) - (4)
         I'm just going to point out that.. - (folkert) - (1)
             AFAIK... - (Another Scott)
         Consequence of Carter's blunder. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
             Well that's an interesting take! :-/ -NT - (Another Scott)

It's their own fault! If they wanted to break the law without consequences, they should have gone into banking.
117 ms