IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: fully agree
So several mass murders that add up 374 deaths in 2011 means all rights for 300 million americans should be abridged because hammers? your math is weak


"All rights"? Hyperbolie much?

Even the Roberts court said that gun rights could be regulated.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
New im not the one howling for assault weapons ban
think the hyperbole is on your side on this one. 374 deaths cause an outright ban on an object?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
New Why not?
Was the Constitution destroyed in 1994 and magically resurrected in 2004?

http://en.wikipedia....sault_Weapons_Ban

Not too many people were killed by privately owned M1A1 tanks, but it's illegal to have one with operational weapons.

Cheers,
Scott.
New shrug, neither one of us can change the others mind
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
New We haven't in 10+ years. ;-)
     why are we banning rifles again? - (boxley) - (19)
         Hard to do mass murder with hammers. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
             fully agree - (boxley) - (5)
                 Re: fully agree - (Another Scott) - (4)
                     im not the one howling for assault weapons ban - (boxley) - (3)
                         Why not? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             shrug, neither one of us can change the others mind -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                 We haven't in 10+ years. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
         PZ's take. - (Another Scott) - (11)
             Another way to put that, in a comment - (drook) - (6)
                 They require skills, and strength and training - (crazy) - (5)
                     Years... - (S1mon_Jester)
                     Yes, and ... ? - (drook) - (1)
                         Wasn't casting comment on them - (crazy)
                     If guns are equalizers... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Oooooohhhhh ... I see what you did there :-D -NT - (drook)
             they are going after the rifles, not the - (boxley) - (3)
                 Don't be so sure. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                     ROFL! - (boxley)
                     Unnacceptable - (crazy)

Happy happy joy joy!
251 ms