More wide-angle tomfoolery:
http://www.flickr.co...90/in/photostream
http://www.flickr.co...28/in/photostream
And a less obviously "woo! I gots me an UWA lens!" one:
http://www.flickr.co...14/in/photostream
Re: New glass!
More wide-angle tomfoolery:
http://www.flickr.co...90/in/photostream http://www.flickr.co...28/in/photostream And a less obviously "woo! I gots me an UWA lens!" one: http://www.flickr.co...14/in/photostream |
|
|
That last would be awesome with a Lytro
--
Drew |
|
|
Impossible to achieve with a Lytro
The crappy optics in the Lytro would deny you, unfortunately.
|
|
|
Guisborough.. On the Trail
Perhaps the WA effect:
Had to stare a while to decide if that was Alfie ?! or a cat! (This even after seeing subsequent, a groomed Alfie, but face-on!) How can a dog--in an odd perspective--seem like a Cat!!11ONE! |
New glass!
- (pwhysall)
- (14)
- July 20, 2012, 12:02:53 PM EDT
Looks like the glass is better than the body now
- (drook)
- (7)
- July 20, 2012, 12:22:34 PM EDT
Er, that's a shallow DoF...
- (pwhysall)
- (6)
- July 20, 2012, 12:37:00 PM EDT
Pixellation is the wrong word
- (drook)
- (5)
- July 20, 2012, 01:05:25 PM EDT
Dynamic range of what?
- (pwhysall)
- July 20, 2012, 06:51:31 PM EDT
I think you mean the mild "fish eye" effect.
- (Another Scott)
- July 20, 2012, 06:59:06 PM EDT
Maybe you're thinking of the noise profile.
- (static)
- (2)
- July 20, 2012, 09:39:31 PM EDT
Bingo
- (drook)
- (1)
- July 21, 2012, 01:46:40 PM EDT
Sorry for the misdirection on my part.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- July 21, 2012, 02:13:00 PM EDT
At least one thing is clearest of all:
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- July 20, 2012, 07:50:36 PM EDT
He most certainly does.
- (pwhysall)
- July 21, 2012, 05:01:36 AM EDT
Re: New glass!
- (pwhysall)
- (3)
- July 24, 2012, 04:49:18 PM EDT
That last would be awesome with a Lytro
-NT
- (drook)
- (1)
- July 24, 2012, 05:34:10 PM EDT
Impossible to achieve with a Lytro
- (pwhysall)
- July 24, 2012, 05:41:25 PM EDT
Guisborough.. On the Trail
- (Ashton)
- July 24, 2012, 07:59:29 PM EDT
