An argument that closed platforms are better, at least in mobile.
A price-tag of one dollar is passive smoking. YouÂre killing people around you, for your own short-term benefit. But again, that wasnÂt the case here. It wasnÂt piracy due to a high price. Instead, this was the endemic casual piracy of convenience.
[...]
Nerds like to say that people care about choice at that level. Nerds are wrong. Nerds care about choice, and nerds are such a tiny minority of people that nobody else much cares what the hell they think. Android is designed with far too much nerd philosophy, and open is gravy to those people because itÂs synonymous with customisation.
[...]
If youÂre an open-source advocate taking objection to this article on the grounds that IÂm somehow different from you, then IÂm sorry to tell you that IÂm not. IÂve walked the walk. If youÂre using an iOS device or a Mac, chances are that some of my code is running on it. YouÂre genuinely welcome.
But that doesnÂt scale to a platform, and it sure as hell doesnÂt scale to the third-party developers who are supporting that platform by releasing software for it, thus adding value to the hardware and OS. Open doesnÂt work. Open is a route to fragmented user experiences, handset-maker Âvalue-adds that are actually the old PC preinstalled crapware problem all over again, and customers who canÂt get a software update for a year-old device.