XML question on "disapble-output-escaping" - (drook) - (18) - March 7, 2012, 10:44:01 AM EST
         Re: XML question on "disapble-output-escaping" - (mvitale) - (15) - March 7, 2012, 07:53:03 PM EST
             Uhh ... not getting what you're saying -NT - (drook) - (2) - March 7, 2012, 05:43:22 PM EST
                 He's having the inverse problem ;-) - (scoenye) - March 7, 2012, 06:34:09 PM EST
                 Check again. Sorry. -NT - (mvitale) - March 7, 2012, 07:53:15 PM EST
             That's (kind of) what I'm thinking - (drook) - (11) - March 7, 2012, 09:38:49 PM EST
                 Not nearly that simple. - (static) - (10) - March 7, 2012, 09:52:04 PM EST
                     Yeah, not at all ... well, maybe it is - (drook) - (9) - March 7, 2012, 10:13:59 PM EST
                         Ah... - (static) - (8) - March 7, 2012, 11:27:49 PM EST
                             It's legal? Well crap, this argument just got a lot harder - (drook) - (7) - March 7, 2012, 11:57:48 PM EST
                                 "Into the database"? - (static) - (6) - March 8, 2012, 04:26:33 AM EST
                                     Umm ... yeah - (drook) - (5) - March 8, 2012, 09:27:36 AM EST
                                         ? Its been a few years since I went to xml dtd school - (boxley) - (4) - March 8, 2012, 09:56:35 AM EST
                                             It's not a string - (drook) - (3) - March 8, 2012, 10:33:16 AM EST
                                                 not my point - (boxley) - (2) - March 8, 2012, 12:07:02 PM EST
                                                     Well ... - (drook) - (1) - March 8, 2012, 12:50:17 PM EST
                                                         I guess that's better than binary blobs. - (static) - March 8, 2012, 03:41:14 PM EST
         Based on the first line and the rest of the thread - (scoenye) - (1) - March 8, 2012, 07:51:11 AM EST
             That's a good point - (drook) - March 8, 2012, 09:28:56 AM EST