Without those, you don't have a representative sample. Meaning, you HAVE to include them to determine correlation. it's great use of data..lconvinced you, didn't it. But it's wrong.
Cute
Without those, you don't have a representative sample. Meaning, you HAVE to include them to determine correlation. it's great use of data..lconvinced you, didn't it. But it's wrong.
Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|
|
Weak.
http://healthcarecos...ax-rates-gdp2.gif
That goes back to 1951. Still want to argue that the bubbles matter for long-term growth in the economy as a whole? For a healthy economy, the maximum total marginal should be around 70% - http://delong.typepa...h-department.html Cheers, Scott. |
|
Hardly
When you remove couple of high growth years in 60s, 80s, and entire decade of 90s and beginning of century...and then claim the remaining is statistically relevant...even if you do start in 51.
Is to chuckle Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
|