IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Understood.
I'd favor government pensions - an extension of Social Security if you will. Allow professional gamblers (nay Financial Professionals) to handle this fund. It would follow you. The plain fact of the matter is that the 401(k) system is a complete and utter failure. It in no way compares with the pension plans of old. But I agree that the pension plans of old cannot be trusted to private enterprise for the reasons we've already listed here. I say, take the monies we are currently blowing on the Wall Street 401(k) fund managers and put it into a government fund with our names attached (much like Social Security). Let the managers work with this enormous pool of money - who knows? There might even be some legitimate investment coming out of this instead of the 30 year established Casino Capitalism of Wall Street.

Even now, if the companies you worked for had pension plans, you wouldn't be completely without income. True, you would not have fared as well as the limited number of folks whose pensions were not raided, but you'd be getting at least something. What if your 401k was handled by somebody like Lehman? Or Bear-Stearns? And lest we forget, the remaining investment banksters are only still alive because of taxpayer money.

In this much I think we can agree: pension funds will always be too juicy to trust to the greedy capitalist money class. They must be handled by genuine representatives of the people. Put another way (and here we may differ) given the choice between the two, I'd put the government in charge of my money far and away over Wall Street.
New I agree government is safer then Wall Street
What if your 401k was handled by somebody like Lehman? Or Bear-Stearns? And lest we forget, the remaining investment banksters are only still alive because of taxpayer money.

Would actually have no effect, because the 401K money isn't the bankers to miss use. That money is secured independent of how the company managing it does. There are still a lot of ways to abuse 401Ks mind you. Companies often setup funds with inflated operating fees to push on people with 401Ks, and there are other scams. No matter where your money is kept there is always the small chance of outright theft.

However, I will agree that I would rather the money kept by the government then Wall Street. The government might be inefficient but it's not intentionally trying to bleed me the way Wall Street is. Such a program would have to be carefully structured though to make sure that it doesn't become a political tool of which ever party is in power, or end up gobbled by Wall Street anyway.

Jay
     Norquist's true colors come through - (jay) - (11)
         But this tax cut is a bad idea. - (mmoffitt) - (10)
             a perfect way to pay for this tax cut! - (boxley)
             I agree we need more revenue - (jay) - (8)
                 I agree on principle, but not on implementation. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                     It's always been off the table - (jay) - (6)
                         They used to be separate. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                             Corporate pensions are a bad idea to begin with - (jay) - (4)
                                 You have got to be kidding me. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                     Flip side of that coin - (jay) - (2)
                                         Understood. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                             I agree government is safer then Wall Street - (jay)

Our job is to take as much of the beer flavor out of the water as we can without getting a customer revolt.
41 ms