IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Well, what they said
but he should really also go for C... not C++. It really is like a portable assembler, and learning how that flies will help him tremendously.
New My assumption
Was that any instruction with C/C++ would start with C and build on from there to the full glory that is C++.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Speaking of Python... ;-)
Are you still using Python 2.x? I'm still on 2.x as I'm still trying to come up to speed on wxPython and it hasn't been ported to Python 3 yet. Python 3.x supposedly is cleaner, but I haven't looked at it yet.

If one were starting from scratch with Python, I assume it would still be safer to stay with 2.x because of all of the libraries which haven't been ported yet.

Thoughts? Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New I still use 2.x
A good summary: http://wiki.python.o.../Python2orPython3

The main point: write your 2.x code as if you were running in 3, and moving to 3 in the future will be relatively painless.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     need to understand how to hugely scale ruby on rails - (boxley) - (37)
         Twitter? - (Another Scott) - (33)
             Ow. - (static) - (32)
                 PHP vs Java scaling - (malraux) - (1)
                     +5, Informative. -NT - (static)
                 I believe they went to Scala on the JVM - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
                     different type of application, easy to shard - (boxley)
                 As BT lectured me a while ago - (crazy) - (27)
                     Saw a presentation on Ruby on Rails yesterday. - (static) - (1)
                         I've used Rails - (malraux)
                     That still holds water... - (folkert) - (24)
                         Dunno about everything, but... - (crazy) - (23)
                             I'd say Java and C. - (Another Scott)
                             Re: Dunno about everything, but... - (malraux)
                             Well, what they said - (jake123) - (3)
                                 My assumption - (malraux) - (2)
                                     Speaking of Python... ;-) - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                         I still use 2.x - (malraux)
                             Ehhh - (crazy) - (15)
                                 Consider Haskell - (jake123) - (1)
                                     Actually, I was - (crazy)
                                 Other stuff. - (static)
                                 What are you trying to teach? - (malraux) - (11)
                                     Way overkill - (crazy) - (10)
                                         Python and C then. - (malraux) - (9)
                                             Is python TIMTOWTDI? - (crazy) - (8)
                                                 No, it's the opposite. - (malraux) - (5)
                                                     Good, that's what I want. - (crazy) - (4)
                                                         Data examples? - (malraux) - (3)
                                                             Here's the code - (crazy) - (2)
                                                                 Re: Here's the code - (malraux) - (1)
                                                                     Thanks -NT - (crazy)
                                                 How do *you* pronounce it? Me: tim-TOW-te-dee -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                                     Re: How do *you* pronounce it? Me: tim-TOW-te-dee - (crazy)
                             Pretty dern close... - (folkert)
         passed the tech screen, thx guys, in person interview Fri -NT - (boxley) - (2)
             Yay! - (crazy) - (1)
                 commute first, then yeah a move after a while -NT - (boxley)

Come sweet slumber, enshroud me in thy purple cloak.
68 ms