emancipation proclaimation was in what year?
and what year was slavery banned in northern states, not territories 1865 I believe.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
It's in the linky.
http://blackhistory....ilWarTimeline.htm
July 1862 - Congress authorizes the president to enlist black military recruits, but Lincoln does not call for a general mobilization of blacks. I posted the previous comment to indicate that compensation was offered to slave owners, at least in some cases. The "War of Northern Aggression" wasn't about impoverishing the South. Freedom for the slaves came in stages depending on various things, as indicated above. HTH. Cheers, Scott. |
|
if its all about the slaves
they would have freed their own prior to 1865 after the war ended
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
Um, for the Conferderates it was all about Slavery. HTH.
|
|
so it wasnt about slavery for the north, thank you
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
The important word is "all". HTH.
|
|
You misunderstand boxley, A S
There is no center to address. He has arrived at a kind of zenlike state, all koan all the time—or to switch hemispheres, a kind of platonic ideal of contrarianism. No countervailing argument can touch him: he will blithely contradict.
I would despise marlowe for this, but box, I am becoming convinced, is an artiste. http://www.youtube.c...tch?v=teMlv3ripSM cordially, |
|
:-) Ja, he's one of a kind. ;-)
|
|
cow or bull?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
|
|
Who ever said it wasn't?
President Lincoln made it pretty clear that it was all about keeping the country in one piece and about eliminating slavery also. That, to the best of my knowledge, has never been in dispute.
"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from." -- E.L. Doctorow |
|
Swing and a miss.
I think you're overplaying that "eliminating slavery also" stuff. But, you're entitled. You won the war, so you get to rewrite history. But, what did old Abe say himself?
My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. A. Lincoln, Letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862. |