IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Syntax is syntax.
What's the point? It seems unnecessarily complex.

However, there are truly functional languages out there, like Haskell, ML, Caml, Miranda, and Scheme. Functional programming has the benefit of being both more concise and provable (in the mathematical sense).

What you're asking about, however, doesn't really serve any purpose that I can see.
Regards,

-scott anderson
New complex?
>> What's the point? It seems unnecessarily complex. <<

Complex? It is simpler than most language approaches.
________________
oop.ismad.com
New Simple.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -Albert Einstein.
Alex

Only two things are certain: the universe and human stupidity;
and I'm not certain about the universe.
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
     Language with syntax like command(params) ? - (tablizer) - (30)
         Most existing languages have that syntax: C, Pascal, Java... -NT - (CRConrad) - (21)
             I think you are missing my point - (tablizer) - (20)
                 Haven't seen one but ... - (altmann) - (2)
                     good suggestions, but..... - (tablizer) - (1)
                         Haskell - (ChrisR)
                 Isn't it obvious that that's fscking styoopid?!? -NT - (CRConrad) - (3)
                     CRC: Not Delphi == Stupid - (tablizer) - (2)
                         It appears to be a different way to do things - (orion) - (1)
                             are you being a meanee? - (tablizer)
                 Syntax is syntax. - (admin) - (2)
                     complex? - (tablizer) - (1)
                         Simple. - (a6l6e6x)
                 Why? - (ChrisR) - (8)
                     not the full story - (tablizer) - (7)
                         Not a contest with Lisp - (ChrisR) - (6)
                             Guessing but... - (Fearless Freep) - (5)
                                 I doubt it... - (ChrisR) - (4)
                                     not true - (tablizer)
                                     Yes, he's been vocal - but then, he wasn't writing a parser! -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                         A "walk a mile in another's compiler" argument? - (tablizer) - (1)
                                             (addendum) - (tablizer)
                 (minor correction) - (tablizer)
         Interesting idea. - (static)
         TCL? - (Arkadiy)
         Name your arguments - (tuberculosis) - (5)
             not sure I fully agree - (tablizer) - (4)
                 Limitation is in your head - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                     Software engineering is all about our heads - (tablizer) - (2)
                         No - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                             not necessarily "ordered" - (tablizer)

Everything is chromed in the future!
89 ms