Just thought of something

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #333,636 by drook 10/3/10 9:26:25 PM Reply	Just thought of something I think that parameter on the [br] tag is non-standard. The CSS way would be <br style="clear:both" /> -- Drew
Post #333,639 by malraux 10/3/10 10:50:07 PM Reply	Yep. BR supports class, id, style, and title attributes. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #333,641 by scoenye 10/3/10 11:08:00 PM Reply	Standard but deprecated And in this case, the CSS variant doesn't help.
Post #333,648 by Andrew Grygus 10/4/10 12:21:46 AM Reply	I have specified doctype 4.1 transitional . . . . . which includes support for the deprecated formatting methods. Safari clearly supports this - just not as well as other browsers.
Post #333,696 by scoenye 10/4/10 10:41:59 PM Reply	One way to consistently clear it... ... is to move the BR tags outside of the enclosing paragraph. (And add enclosing P tags around the "Varieties of fish" intro paragraph.) As to why, I guess only Steve knows...
Post #333,699 by Andrew Grygus 10/4/10 11:43:54 PM 10/4/10 11:54:05 PM Reply	Re: "One way to consistently clear it... ... is to move the BR tags outside of the enclosing paragraph" Originally that's how I had it, but it caused very inconsistent spacing and a number of other serious display problems. I don't remember them all but one I do is that links didn't hit anywhere near the right place. Moving the br tags within the paragraph solved all that and there's no way I'm moving them back. Edited by Andrew Grygus Oct. 4, 2010, 11:54:05 PM EDT Expand All History

Hmmm . . . this is interesting: Safari and Chrome . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (40) - Sept. 26, 2010, 10:35:33 PM EDT

What's really interesting... - (malraux) - (11) - Sept. 26, 2010, 11:00:10 PM EDT

Thanks, I'll give that a try . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Sept. 26, 2010, 11:23:22 PM EDT

Different Scott... ;-) - (malraux) - (2) - Sept. 26, 2010, 11:30:19 PM EDT

Were you using a Mac? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Sept. 26, 2010, 11:49:05 PM EDT

Yes. -NT - (malraux) - Sept. 27, 2010, 09:18:43 AM EDT

Timing issues, huh? - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Sept. 27, 2010, 01:21:47 AM EDT

Not just speed - (drook) - (5) - Sept. 27, 2010, 09:54:09 AM EDT

And there are quite a few of those on that page - (scoenye) - (4) - Sept. 28, 2010, 07:09:26 PM EDT

I've been over and over my nesting and closings . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Sept. 28, 2010, 09:36:45 PM EDT

Try the validator - (drook) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2010, 10:42:48 PM EDT

Not so much unbalanced nesting - (scoenye) - Sept. 28, 2010, 11:01:52 PM EDT

Yeah, a lot of values are not quoted . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Sept. 29, 2010, 01:12:03 AM EDT

Typo - "North American. buyers" -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 26, 2010, 11:00:55 PM EDT

Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code. - (Andrew Grygus) - (26) - Oct. 3, 2010, 02:47:06 AM EDT

Interesting.. - (Ashton) - Oct. 3, 2010, 04:07:02 AM EDT

Re: Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code - (mvitale) - Oct. 3, 2010, 09:28:09 AM EDT

Still shifted. - (malraux) - (7) - Oct. 3, 2010, 11:16:55 AM EDT

I was thinking that last as well. Must be something subtle. -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 3, 2010, 11:22:14 AM EDT

I have done the div thing mvitale suggested. - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Oct. 3, 2010, 11:57:49 AM EDT

Quick thought: Possible font substitutions? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:04:06 PM EDT

Re: Quick thought: Possible font substitutions? - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:11:04 PM EDT

Works. - (malraux) - (2) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:10:51 PM EDT

It doesn't work for the other formatting problems though. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:34:07 PM EDT

Not a fix, a replacement. -NT - (malraux) - Oct. 3, 2010, 12:52:05 PM EDT

weird issues - (SpiceWare) - (8) - Oct. 3, 2010, 01:49:16 PM EDT

Somebody updated it - (SpiceWare) - (7) - Oct. 5, 2010, 11:19:55 AM EDT

Yup, and a "reduced test case" . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Oct. 5, 2010, 12:05:46 PM EDT

Well, if you can't fix the problem, fix the spec :-( -NT - (hnick) - Oct. 5, 2010, 02:10:47 PM EDT

I can try to reduce it - (SpiceWare) - (4) - Oct. 5, 2010, 02:47:41 PM EDT

Oh, I can reduce it very easily, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2010, 04:58:43 PM EDT

And here it is. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2010, 11:11:07 PM EDT

On a Mac - (Ashton) - Oct. 6, 2010, 02:09:06 AM EDT

Display at 1149 pixels wide... - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2010, 07:34:39 AM EDT

Just thought of something - (drook) - (5) - Oct. 3, 2010, 09:26:25 PM EDT

Yep. - (malraux) - Oct. 3, 2010, 10:50:07 PM EDT

Standard but deprecated - (scoenye) - Oct. 3, 2010, 11:08:00 PM EDT

I have specified doctype 4.1 transitional . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Oct. 4, 2010, 12:21:46 AM EDT

One way to consistently clear it... - (scoenye) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2010, 10:41:59 PM EDT

Re: "One way to consistently clear it... - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 4, 2010, 11:54:05 PM EDT

"Web Browser v2.30.2" or Epiphany... - (folkert) - Oct. 3, 2010, 10:45:51 PM EDT

Your boredness knob must go to 11...
140 ms