IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Thanks, I'll give that a try . . .
. . when I can get back to it.

What I saw on the Mac was the top left photo and the whole body shifted to the right of the left column, which looked pretty bad. These failures to clear left aren't so bad. I'll have to take a look on another Mac as soon as I can.

What! you only noticed one typo on that huge page? Fixed - thanks.
New Different Scott... ;-)
I didn't see the photo shifted, just everything below the second HR.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Were you using a Mac?
New Yes.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     Hmmm . . . this is interesting: Safari and Chrome . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (40)
         What's really interesting... - (malraux) - (11)
             Thanks, I'll give that a try . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                 Different Scott... ;-) - (malraux) - (2)
                     Were you using a Mac? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Yes. -NT - (malraux)
             Timing issues, huh? - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                 Not just speed - (drook) - (5)
                     And there are quite a few of those on that page - (scoenye) - (4)
                         I've been over and over my nesting and closings . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                             Try the validator - (drook) - (2)
                                 Not so much unbalanced nesting - (scoenye)
                                 Yeah, a lot of values are not quoted . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         Typo - "North American. buyers" -NT - (Another Scott)
         Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code. - (Andrew Grygus) - (26)
             Interesting.. - (Ashton)
             Re: Conclusion: Safari (Win) can't render W3C validated code - (mvitale)
             Still shifted. - (malraux) - (7)
                 I was thinking that last as well. Must be something subtle. -NT - (Another Scott)
                 I have done the div thing mvitale suggested. - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                     Quick thought: Possible font substitutions? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Re: Quick thought: Possible font substitutions? - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Works. - (malraux) - (2)
                         It doesn't work for the other formatting problems though. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             Not a fix, a replacement. -NT - (malraux)
             weird issues - (SpiceWare) - (8)
                 Somebody updated it - (SpiceWare) - (7)
                     Yup, and a "reduced test case" . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                         Well, if you can't fix the problem, fix the spec :-( -NT - (hnick)
                         I can try to reduce it - (SpiceWare) - (4)
                             Oh, I can reduce it very easily, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                                 And here it is. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                                     On a Mac - (Ashton)
                                     Display at 1149 pixels wide... - (folkert)
             Just thought of something - (drook) - (5)
                 Yep. - (malraux)
                 Standard but deprecated - (scoenye)
                 I have specified doctype 4.1 transitional . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                     One way to consistently clear it... - (scoenye) - (1)
                         Re: "One way to consistently clear it... - (Andrew Grygus)
             "Web Browser v2.30.2" or Epiphany... - (folkert)

Did she think she was going to land in the back of a Pier 1 truck carrying papa-san chairs?
59 ms