IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why are browsers so bad at printing HTML?
I wanted to print the first 4 pages of this - http://curbly.com/se...ide-the-trash-can (yeah, it's got a lot of ads and some errors in the HTML, apparently).

I'm on WinXP, trying to print to a networked Lexmark E234 laser printer.

In a print-preview, Firefox 3.6.8 shows the first page and a blank 2nd page.

IE 8 shows the same. IE 6 shows a mess.

Opera 9.64 is similar to FF.

Chrome lists 13 pages in the print dialog but won't do a preview.

Safari's print preview works, but it chugs along at 50% cpu for a long time when told to print but the printer never spits anything out.

Why is HTML printing such an afterthought? I thought this stuff was supposed to be WYSIWYG.

<grumble>

Cheers,
Scott.
New I think much of the "afterthought" . . .
. . is by Web page designers - but "afterthought" is a misnomer - they never gave the slightest thought to printing.

Of course bloggers are the worst of the lot.
New Holy...
Did you LOOK at the HTML?

its all done in XML and JSON.

The Text before the inline ad is on one line...

The Text *and* the Pictures after the inline ad is in one line

AND all images are in their own containers {p}{/p}.

Blah...

New No, but I suspected as much.
But still, if the browser can show it, why can't it print it?

I can understand things like blocked ads or animations causing issues when trying to print, but the fact remains that it can be rendered on a 2D screen, so there should be some WYSIWYG approximation that shows up on paper. There should be some "correct" way to print HTML that browsers should be able to do.

OO.org 3.2 wasn't even able to render it properly on the screen. :-(

Cheers,
Scott.
New Dumped out to PDF in about 1 sec.
Safari 5.0.1, OS X 10.6.4.

Looks fine.
New That's cheating. ;-) But may be a good solution. Thanks.
New File it as a bug?
Especially with a URL you can provide.

Note the latest Opera is 10.6. I don't think there has been printing improvements in that version, but I don't know.

Wade.

Q:Is it proper to eat cheeseburgers with your fingers?
A:No, the fingers should be eaten separately.
New Good idea. Doesn't seem to be a priority though...
http://support.mozil...t?s=printing&as=s

Firefox prints pages in a different layout

Certain kinds of web page layout techniques can cause Firefox to print pages incorrectly. Problems can include a different print layout than the screen layout and only the first page being printed.

Copy the page to another program

You can copy the web page to another program, like a word processor, and print from there.

1. In the Edit menu, choose Select All.
2. Again in the Edit menu, choose Copy.
3. In the other program, choose Edit, then Paste.
4. Print from the other program.

Print the page as text

You can save the page as plain text and then print that. You will lose any formatting and images on the page.

1. In the File menu, choose Save Page As....
2. Save the page as a Text File.
3. Open the file you saved and print it.



:-/

Cheers,
Scott.
New Why?
On the fly device specific interpretation.
Confusion between screen layout possibilities and printer possibilities.

That's what bitmapped screen capture is for. Final print quality may suck, but at least everything is there.

New That's what CSS is for :-)
I usually do include printer specific CSS that hides the navigation crud, specifies basic font size in points, etc.
New You are the exception...
95% of the current Web-Designer / Web Developers pawning themselves off as that... don't even know what the *HELL* you are talking about.
     Why are browsers so bad at printing HTML? - (Another Scott) - (10)
         I think much of the "afterthought" . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         Holy... - (folkert) - (1)
             No, but I suspected as much. - (Another Scott)
         Dumped out to PDF in about 1 sec. - (pwhysall) - (1)
             That's cheating. ;-) But may be a good solution. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott)
         File it as a bug? - (static) - (1)
             Good idea. Doesn't seem to be a priority though... - (Another Scott)
         Why? - (crazy) - (2)
             That's what CSS is for :-) - (scoenye) - (1)
                 You are the exception... - (folkert)

DUUude...
258 ms