Poorly behaved automation SUCKS!

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #327,580 by drook 6/8/10 8:07:28 PM Reply	Poorly behaved automation SUCKS! When I moved to the new server, and from Blogger to Wordpress, I took a week validating all links, making sure everything that didn't map automatically had a custom 301 rule in the .htaccess file. I just discovered none of those rules are there any more. Something updated .htaccess on May 13th. Stepped all over my customization, and didn't even leave a damn backup. This fucking blows. -- Drew
Post #327,582 by boxley 6/8/10 8:58:15 PM Reply	Re: Poorly behaved automation SUCKS! 10 5 * * * cp $MYHOMEDIRECTORY/htaccess.mine $DOCROOT/.htaccess
Post #327,586 by drook 6/8/10 9:37:06 PM Reply	Sure, if I still had the rules it would be better to auto append or prepend or ... something. Can .htaccess files be chained like apache conf files? -- Drew
Post #327,589 by folkert 6/8/10 10:42:43 PM Reply	Re: Sure, if I still had the rules If includes are allowed. `include somefile.conf` or something like that. That is unless overrides are not in effect. (or maybe are in effect. its a toss up)
Post #327,591 by drook 6/8/10 11:29:19 PM Reply	That plus Box's trick should do it -- Drew
Post #327,583 by Another Scott 6/8/10 8:58:25 PM Reply	:-(

Poorly behaved automation SUCKS! - (drook) - (5) - June 8, 2010, 08:07:28 PM EDT

Re: Poorly behaved automation SUCKS! - (boxley) - (3) - June 8, 2010, 08:58:15 PM EDT

Sure, if I still had the rules - (drook) - (2) - June 8, 2010, 09:37:06 PM EDT

Re: Sure, if I still had the rules - (folkert) - (1) - June 8, 2010, 10:42:43 PM EDT

That plus Box's trick should do it -NT - (drook) - June 8, 2010, 11:29:19 PM EDT

:-( -NT - (Another Scott) - June 8, 2010, 08:58:25 PM EDT

How convenient is that??
59 ms