IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I had the same question
The rest of the report goes on to say that raw milk consumption is something like .5% of total, and raw milk was responsible for .4% of the total reported illnesses. (going from memory, the numbers may be slightly different)
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Problem with the numbers
There are multiple reported instances where CDC was investigating possible food-borne illness, and they stopped asking questions after the respondent said they drank raw milk. So in several of the cases counted as "raw milk contamination" there was never a positive test for pathogens in any milk. And the numbers are so small that even a few instances of this are enough to skew the percentages.
--

Drew
New Re: Problem with the numbers
Even with the numbers reported, however, the incidence of illness is smaller than the use of raw milk.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     we is the gummint and we are here to help - (boxley) - (17)
         Almost right - (drook) - (7)
             not quite - (boxley) - (1)
                 True, but it's a gray area - (drook)
             Happened to bread, too. - (static)
             Devil's advocate - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 Back atchya - (drook) - (2)
                     You're changing the subject. ;-) - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         Yeah, I know - (drook)
         That is what the FDA does - (jay) - (7)
             They should be focusing on transparency - (drook) - (3)
                 The FDA often deliberately obscures . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                     I've noticed that several times lately - (drook)
                     hmm - No-HFCS Hunt's lists sugar 2nd, no other sweetener - (SpiceWare)
             I had the same question - (malraux) - (2)
                 Problem with the numbers - (drook) - (1)
                     Re: Problem with the numbers - (malraux)
         Thanks! IGM.. for an intelligent er, colloquy on an - (Ashton)

You know the French. The problem with them is that they have no word for entrepreneur.
56 ms