Agreed

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #32,606 by bepatient 3/18/02 1:51:26 PM Reply	Agreed There should be no tax benefit to these programs...especially when you consider your own situation. The company treats it as a deferred liability...but that liability may never be incurred. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #33,944 by Ashton 3/31/02 6:48:41 PM Reply	But.. is there no "recapture rule" .. as with many/most? other such "deferred" imaginary expenses? And if there isn't any mechanism for such eventual balancing of books via simple arithmetic -?- How could such a rule have been passed by the CPAs of the world? Isn't Dismal's biggest claim as a pseudo science: accountability ? Ashton

Options as expenses to a company's earnings - (lincoln) - (10) - March 18, 2002, 10:21:38 AM EST

I'm confused - (Silverlock) - (8) - March 18, 2002, 10:56:00 AM EST

No they can't . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - March 18, 2002, 11:03:25 AM EST

Well yeah. Of couse it's a made up number. - (Silverlock) - March 18, 2002, 11:07:52 AM EST

The probable answer... - (bepatient) - (5) - March 18, 2002, 11:14:13 AM EST

Why do you say that? - (Silverlock) - (4) - March 18, 2002, 11:36:17 AM EST

The tech sector... - (bepatient) - (3) - March 18, 2002, 12:24:03 PM EST

Re: The tech sector... - (Yendor) - (2) - March 18, 2002, 01:39:35 PM EST

Agreed - (bepatient) - (1) - March 18, 2002, 01:51:26 PM EST

But.. is there no "recapture rule" - (Ashton) - March 31, 2002, 06:48:41 PM EST

Re: Options as expenses to a company's earnings - (BDaye) - March 31, 2002, 06:02:58 PM EST

Sentinels and abdominal tracking shrimp.
37 ms