IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
/
Maybe not so simple then
Post #324,594
by
drook
4/13/10 3:10:33 PM
Reply
Maybe not so simple then
I assumed this was an easy thing to do. Guess I'll do the temp table. This is a one-time maintenance job (yes, really) so I won't need something fast or repeatable.
--
Drew
Dumb SQL question
- (
drook
)
- (12)
- April 13, 2010, 08:38:58 AM EDT
My lazy way
- (
crazy
)
- (3)
- April 13, 2010, 11:23:53 AM EDT
You have ...
- (
beepster
)
- (2)
- April 13, 2010, 01:26:55 PM EDT
Depends
- (
crazy
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2010, 02:05:59 PM EDT
Maybe not so simple then
- (
drook
)
- April 13, 2010, 03:10:33 PM EDT
Did you try a self-join?
- (
static
)
- (1)
- April 13, 2010, 08:17:00 PM EDT
Not yet, but about to
- (
drook
)
- April 13, 2010, 09:23:05 PM EDT
And then there is the (ugly) semi-manual way
- (
CRConrad
)
- (5)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 08:07:41 PM EDT
This is also good for invasive updates.
- (
static
)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 08:14:45 PM EDT
That's my kind of ugly
- (
drook
)
- (2)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 09:12:21 PM EDT
It's also an interesting lesson in pragmatism.
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 09:17:00 PM EDT
I've done round trips mySQL -> vim -> PHP -> mySQL
- (
drook
)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 09:27:26 PM EDT
Another batching method
- (
jay
)
- Sept. 15, 2010, 11:25:34 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
I've heard it before; and
I didn't care the first time.
53 ms