IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New each person
posting here is posting around a different subject. That was on laffer...
I will choose a path that's clear. I will choose freewill.
New What was your point then?
Laffer describes voluntary behavior in response to higher or lower costs. Your example family of 4 making $60k doesn't have the option to offshore their income to hide it from taxation. So why should we be looking at them?

You asked the question: Why aren't we? My answer is, because it doesn't apply.

After you show why Laffer is meaningful at the bottom end of the income scale, then you can show how much tax revenue we could expect to gain from changes there. Then you can compare that to the amount that could be gained from returning the top tax rates to historical averages.

If you can do all of that, then I'll believe you honestly think tax rates at the bottom end are a meaningful part of this discussion. I'm convinced they're not. And I'm pretty sure you know that too.
--

Drew
     Almost half on the free ride plan - (beepster) - (44)
         Heh. Make that nearly 2/3. - (Another Scott) - (39)
             So why aren't we... - (beepster) - (38)
                 Who's we? - (Another Scott) - (37)
                     @00k peanuts depending on where you live - (boxley) - (36)
                         Top 2-3% says otherwise. - (Another Scott) - (35)
                             Tell them to pay some - (beepster) - (34)
                                 If you're in the top 2-3%, what are you? "Middle class"??? - (Another Scott) - (32)
                                     Re: If you're in the top 2-3%, what are you? "Middle class" - (folkert)
                                     In NYC...pretty much. - (beepster) - (30)
                                         WOT - (jbrabeck) - (2)
                                             :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                             NYC, not SLC ;-) -NT - (beepster)
                                         Only if you twist the words to mean something else. - (Another Scott) - (25)
                                             These terms define a standard of living - (beepster) - (24)
                                                 And so are the opportunities - (crazy) - (23)
                                                     So you think the folks in Brooklyn or the Bronx are making.. - (beepster) - (22)
                                                         Huh? - (crazy) - (21)
                                                             What I'm saying - (beepster) - (20)
                                                                 The tax in question is an *income* tax. - (Another Scott)
                                                                 Curious - (drook) - (18)
                                                                     Yup - (crazy) - (17)
                                                                         Missing point of the article, aren't you. - (beepster) - (16)
                                                                             AKA - "The way to Utopia is via a race to the bottom." :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                 Hardly - (beepster)
                                                                             You argue tactics while assaulting our motives - (drook) - (7)
                                                                                 How is it that you "know" this.. - (beepster) - (6)
                                                                                     That's not the argument I'm making - (drook)
                                                                                     The Laffer curve is not linear - (mhuber) - (4)
                                                                                         No duh - (beepster) - (3)
                                                                                             Look at your own argument - (drook) - (2)
                                                                                                 each person - (beepster) - (1)
                                                                                                     What was your point then? - (drook)
                                                                             So, is the strategy - (mhuber) - (2)
                                                                                 No, the strategy should be.. - (beepster) - (1)
                                                                                     "Creativity" is always the wrong answer - (drook)
                                                                             1.5% sound about right? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                                 Apples and Oranges - (beepster) - (1)
                                                                                     That's just one example. - (Another Scott)
                                         I've used the same example - (crazy)
                                 That's the problem beep - (jake123)
         Re: Almost half on the free ride plan - (malraux) - (3)
             Thanks for the pointer. -NT - (Another Scott)
             he's missing a key point... - (beepster) - (1)
                 The rest of the first world - (jake123)

Who left that on the floor?
66 ms