Apparently~ everyone is current with his proposals and demos except CIEIOs and related Suits.
(Do they dogmatically tune-out his ideas / read only other Suits' reports or, as I suspect -- does Biz 101 so thoroughly mangle whole sub-networks of grey cells that, well ... you know..)
'Course though..
. . .
Once we visualize cars as chips with wheels, it's easier to imagine airplanes as chips with wings, farms as chips with soil, houses as chips with inhabitants. Yes, they will have mass, but that mass will be subjugated by the overwhelming amount of knowledge and information flowing through it. In economic terms, these objects will behave as if they had no mass at all. In that way, they migrate to the network economy.
.. smacks of that sort of Boolean minimalism / like, say 'MAN ls' / that techno-types are prone towards.
A 'farm' shall never be "a chip with soil" any more than a penis shall be "a manic obsession to Penetrate--attached to a homo-sap."
Live critters do not obey fanciful network diagrams. Evah. Live things are walking metaphors.
[Only Consumers easily may be herded systematically; there remains a question re.such:]
Just how 'live' IS a fully-programmed I Want I Want Buying-robot ??