did you get her number by chance?

It's been disturbing me for a while now:

There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier,"

So somebody is FINALLY admitting the "settlers" are just as much of an OCCUPYING FORCE as the soldiers are?

Good! (Funny, though, that you should use that confession as a .sig?)

[or between a] "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW.

Or perhaps, "The target is the OCCUPYING FORCE."?

Funny, how he sees it only from one side, when you can just as well see it from the other side altogether, isn't it?

\ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum

Who is this guy, exactly?

Never mind -- judging from you using this as a .sig, and from the tone of the last part, it looks as if Harvey intended his statement as YAN variant of "The Jew is ALWAYS the poor persecuted party!", right?

Too bad he didn't -- nor, apparently, did you? -- consider that what he's ACTUALLY saying is that, PLUS: "...even when it's his soldiers and his 'settlers' who are being the occupying and oppressing force!".

And you _wonder_ that the Israelis risk being seen as incessant whiners, trying to (ab)use the Holocaust of half a century ago as a license for themselves to imitate the Nazis for ever and ever?!?

Post #32,140 by boxley 3/14/02 8:49:40 AM Reply	did you get her number by chance? There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum
Post #32,543 by CRConrad 3/18/02 4:14:12 AM Reply	...or by intention? OT: Your .sig It's been disturbing me for a while now: There is no difference between a "settler," "soldier," So somebody is FINALLY admitting the "settlers" are just as much of an OCCUPYING FORCE as the soldiers are? Good! (Funny, though, that you should use that confession as a .sig?) [or between a] "secular," or "Chassidic Jew." The target is the JEW. Or perhaps, "The target is the OCCUPYING FORCE."? Funny, how he sees it only from one side, when you can just as well see it from the other side altogether, isn't it? \ufffd Harvey Tannenbaum Who is this guy, exactly? Never mind -- judging from you using this as a .sig, and from the tone of the last part, it looks as if Harvey intended his statement as YAN variant of "The Jew is ALWAYS the poor persecuted party!", right? Too bad he didn't -- nor, apparently, did you? -- consider that what he's ACTUALLY saying is that, PLUS: "...even when it's his soldiers and his 'settlers' who are being the occupying and oppressing force!". And you _wonder_ that the Israelis risk being seen as incessant whiners, trying to (ab)use the Holocaust of half a century ago as a license for themselves to imitate the Nazis for ever and ever?!? Christian R. Conrad Of course, who am I to point fingers? I'm in the "Information Technology" business, prima facia evidence that there's bats in the bell tower. -- [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=27764\|Andrew Grygus]
Post #32,564 by boxley 3/18/02 10:25:58 AM Reply	Ya needed to read the article about an ultra orthodox community targeted by a suicide bomber. The point of the artile and the sig is that the ultra orthodox jews dont beleive in the state of Israel and would much prefer that the Arabs ran the place, to their mindset only G_d can come down and make the kingdom happen so all these Human Jews making a state are defying G_d's will. Why would the HAMAS start targeting people who want no Israeli government anywhere? Hence the Sig. thanx, bill The Bill of Rights, Void where ptohibited.

Welcome to IWETHEY!