http://www.bing.com/...cution+protection
why they dont just cleanup libc is beyond me
the latest attack vector in IE
http://www.bing.com/...cution+protection
why they dont just cleanup libc is beyond me If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
|
|
That was a BING-i-fied Wikipedia Entry
|
|
did not notice, can they do that legally?
If we torture the data long enough, it will confess. (Ronald Coase, Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences, 1991)
|
|
It says that up top
"Reference » Wikipedia Articles"
and "view original wikipedia article" Although they do make it look like it's their content unless you look hard. --
Drew |
|
They are doing that for *MANY* things.
The are copying content wholesale to keep the traffic from getting there.
Though they are supposed to do a cache refresh every time someone hits it. With reports of BING DOSing site scrubbing for content (and specifically using robots.txt as a guide of *where* to go), I seriously doubt they are playing by the (implied or otherwise) rules. |
|
The bot took out CPAN Testers last week
|
|
Never mind. Happens when you read threads from the bootom up
|
|
Yeah yeah... we all do it.
I've gone as far to say things that are complete hogwash at times... when I was replying to something I thought was something else...
(and no Peter, its not *ALL THE TIME*) |